Intergalactic Weather Map - An Ice Cube Makes the Room Warmer?

The nonsense is never ending at NASA. Check out this article: NASA - Intergalactic Weather Map

To begin with, they are producing a temperature map of the space surrounding galaxy NGC 5813 and reverse the temperature scale. Instead of using red to represent the cooler temperature and blue to represent the higher temperature, such as in reality, blue is cooler and red is warmer.

In the produced map, the galaxy is seen as cooler than the surrounding space. NASA's interpretation? The cool galaxy is heating up the surrounding space at huge scales of distance. An ice cube makes the room warmer? How does NASA explain this?

Powerful jets produced as gas swirls toward the black hole push cavities into the hot gas and drive shock waves -- like sonic booms -- outwards, heating the gas.

So gas (nearly invisible hydrogen with practically no mass) swirls into a mythical black hole and then produces powerful shock waves that heat up vast areas of space light years from the source without heating the galaxy. A rational person would ask why the more dense gas near the galaxy does not heat up more than the far distant regions of space! It is as though their proposed shock waves possess magical properties transcending space.

If one were to look at this scenario from the perspective of the Aether Physics Model, one would see the so-called "black hole" as a region of disappearing matter at the center of a galaxy. The larger a galaxy is, the faster matter disappears at its center. Thus the light and matter traveling to the center of the galaxy disappears and the center of the galaxy appears cooler than the surrounding space. A similar effect happens in tornadoes, and wind vortexes on Earth, although in these cases the heat is pumped away in the form of infrared radiation, such as at the tops of strong thunderstorms.

Matter continually is created through the Casimir effect (affecting electrons), and fusion (affecting protons). Thus in regions away from galactic centers, it would appear warmer.

The collapsing of matter at the centers of galaxies and the generation of matter in the outer regions creates the inward spiral that is seen in all well established galaxies.

The jets observed in the polar regions of the galaxies are similar to the jets of heat seen above thunderstorms. The inward spiral both destroys matter, but also squeezes matter and causes some of it to escape at high velocities.

Radiation ripples show the Big Bang theory is wrong.

Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths, Wired reports.

What the evidence really suggests is that the Universe is eternal, as the Aether Physics Model suggests.

The Big Bang theory absurdly claims all matter matter in the Universe exploded out of a point smaller than an atom. The estimate for the beginning time of this explosion has varied from 13 billion years ago to 20 billion years ago, depending upon where in the Universe one looks.

The large bands of dark matter, if they exist, are more likely to be caused by random magnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational structures that occur at huge scales, which would mirror that randomly spread clusters of galaxies throughout the visible Universe.

Another failure of the Big Bang theory is that there is no apparent edge to the Universe. The stronger telescopes are made, the further they can see, with no end in sight.

The article tries to spin the lack of Big Bang evidence into a new theory where concentric circles are born from the same location in the Universe, which would mean there would be something magical about that location. And then concludes with this sentence, "However he added that there was not enough detail to assess the reality of the circles yet." In other words, there is no more evidence for the concentric circles than there is for the Big Bang.

The Aether Physics Model shows that the Universe is continually expanding and contracting at the same time. The outer rings of galaxies expand with new matter, and the centers of galaxies implode old matter, which causes the galactic spirals to occur. Dark matter is nothing more than visible matter losing its charge when the space-time around it collapses. Visible matter is dark matter that gains charge when new Aether is generated during the Casimir effect and fusion.

"Empty Eruption"?

According to the Standard Model, magnetism is a property of matter, it is not a substance of itself.  Yet, when science observation shows that magnetism is indeed a substance of itself, scientists have no problem saying so.  The following is from spaceweather.com...

This was an "empty eruption." It hurled no significant cloud of plasma into space. Imagine something exploding with more power than ten atomic bombs and not producing a spray of debris. That's essentially what happened here. The loop was made of more magnetism than matter.

Magnetism is empty space, hence it produces an empty eruption when it explodes.  So it is very clear that magnetism is real and has real properties, which releases real energy.  But what is this empty space that it could release so much energy?

The empty space is Aether, the non-material substance that carries light across the Universe and which physicists claim does not exist.  And despite the constant denials, physicists continually observe empty space doing work such as with phonons, magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, spins, and other observable non-material forms of reality.

How much longer will it be before Aether is welcomed back into mainstream science?

Vajra Periodic Table

Today, I have released the new Vajra Periodic Table for the Aether Physics Model. The purpose of this periodic table is to provide a visual reference to researchers trying to discover the nuclear binding energy equation.

Fernando Dufour came up with the general concept in his 3D Periodic Table, however, his model places all the elements to the same side of the hydrogen atom. It seemed to me that this is not the natural state of atomic construction. Atomic construction should be symmetrical, and so I began drawing images of a symmetrical periodic table until this form manifested.

What struck me about the finished layout is that the overall design resembled the ancient Vajra concept. It almost seems as though the ancients already knew how atoms constructed within the Aether. So I named the periodic table after the ancient Vajra model.

You can purchase a wall print of this Periodic Table in just about any size at Zazzle.  The poster was designed to be 42.5" by 32.5" and is in high resolution in the print format.

Scientific Discovery Too Hard - Turning in the Towel

It looks like new discoveries in mainstream physics is nearing the end.

Russell Stannard, professor emeritus of physics at the Open University, argues that although existing scientific knowledge will continue to be applied in news ways, "the gaining of knowledge about fundamental laws of nature and the constituents of the world, that must come to an end”.

Too bad. If they would study the Aether Physics Model and see that their charge notation is wrong, and that there are two quantifiable fundamental charges (electrostatic charge and magnetic charge), they would be making new fundamental discoveries. Furthermore, science would suddenly become easy to understand, and agree with common sense.

Instead of spending billions of dollars and wasting thousands of top-rate scientists time by working on particle accelerators designed to find non-existent particles, they could be reworking the foundations of physics to fix its errors.

But try to show these same physicists their errors and their feelings get hurt. They become incredibly defensive and extremely rude. Instead of admitting error, they build bigger machines, spend more money, and waste more time. They are like little children who have not been taught humility.

Eventually, the one-track-minded scientists will die off and younger, more flexible minds will fill their prestigious seats. Won't they be shocked when they see the proper foundations for physics were long ignored, even though they were made plainly visible on the Internet?

APM solves Casimir's Problem

In 1948, Hendrick Casimir and D. Polder wrote a paper concerning their quantification of what has become known as the Casimir force.

Casimir derived his equation to a fourth order perturbation. This amounted to a reasonable approximation for the force, but it was not precise.

In the Aether Physics Model I developed the magnetic force law for the electron. Later, I discovered the magnetic force law for the electron was nearly identical to the Casimir force equation, although transposed into different units and constants.

Just today, it was brought to my attention that Hendrick Casimir's paper published in Phys Rev 73, 360 is now available online. Here is the last paragraph of that paper:

"The very simple form of eq (56) and the analogous formula (25) suggest that it might be possible to derive these expressions, perhaps apart from the numerical factors, by more elementary considerations. This would be desirable since it would also give a more physical background to our result, a result which in our opinion is rather remarkable. So far we have not been able to find such a simple argument."

Casimir had been looking for the simple expression for his equation, but was unable to find it. The reason was because modern physics incorrectly notates the dimension of charge (it should always be distributed) and also modern physics did not discover the proper quantification for magnetic charge (strong charge, electromagnetic charge). The APM fixed these errors of modern physics and solved the Casimir Problem.

Radioactivity is influenced by the Sun

It has long been my view that radioactivity rates are not constant. My reasoning rests partially upon the counter-intuitive conclusions often determined by radiocarbon dating, but also on variations in Aether densities (magnetic flux densities).

It looks like the scientific evidence supports this view. A new article appearing on Stanford University News reports on the observation of variable decay rates coinciding with solar activity.

In particular, the radioactive decay rates coincide with the Earth being closest to the Sun and when a specific side of the Sun faces Earth.

Space is a fabric of Aether units. Like all things in the Universe, Aether is not smoothly distributed everywhere. In fact, Aether is very dense inside material bodies, such as the Sun, and very rarefied at the Sun's surface. This is caused by neutron formation, which pinches the Aether fabric.

The decay of free neutrons, and neutrons in free spaces within certain atomic elements (radioactive elements), should be partially dependent upon Aether density. Changes in Aether density will cause changes in distances between subatomic particles and even within molecules and atoms. This will affect the decay rate of neutrons, which in turn affect the decay rate of the atoms and molecules the neutrons are part of.

The closer the Earth is to the Sun, the less dense the Aether is. There also appears to be a powerful magnetic structure emanating from within the Sun and extending to the outer edges of the solar system; like a magnetic beacon. This causes alternations in magnetic flux density (Aether density) as the magnetic structure passes by Earth.

Further, the magnetic intensity of the Sun is likely to be affected by the Sun's position within the galactic magnetic field. So there is likely to be variations of radioactive decay extending over very long term cycles, just as there are observed variations at shorter cycles. Also, magnetic effects associated with gravitational waves from distant supernovas should also affect neutron decay rates.

Unlike the neutrino hypothesis proposed by Stanford scientists, the magnetic flux density hypothesis can explain how decay rates can be affected a day or so before solar flares, as changes in magnetic structures are already known to be the cause of solar flares.

Expanding Universe

The same physics stories are often repeated, almost suggesting a conspiracy to brainwash the public. Scientists have said for decades the Universe is expanding, and it seems every couple of weeks we are reminded of this.

The Aether Physics Model does suggest the Universe is continually expanding. But the APM also points out the Universe is continually contracting, such as at the centers of galaxies.

As protons bind with electrons, they produce neutrons and also force their encapsulating Aether units to fold over onto each other. Thus two Aether units occupy the same space as one Aether unit. This means that as matter becomes denser by the production of neutrons, space also becomes denser.

However, as space becomes denser adjoining Aether units are stretched to help keep space "full." This means the regions of space surrounding dense objects gets rarefied and can produce optical effects on the photons passing through it. The optical effects manifest as gravitational lensing, orbital precessing, and other Relativity effects.

As matter and space become too dense in the centers of galaxies, the space collapses and unravels while taking the matter within that space with it. Thus, entire stars disappear forever as they enter the galactic core's disintegrating vortex.

If contraction was the whole story, the Universe would shrink until there was just a small pile of matter left floating in space, which would not be dense enough to cause the unraveling of the remaining Aether.

Fortunately, due to the Casimir effect on electrons and hot/cold fusion effects on protons, new visible matter constantly generates. Along with the creation of new matter also comes the creation of new Aether units, or space.

And so it goes. The mass underlying visible matter is converted to dark matter at the centers of galaxies and then through the Casimir effect and fusion, new matter is created elsewhere in the galaxy. When visible matter becomes unraveled, its form becomes dark matter. This is because the Aether is the source of electricity and magnetism. If dark matter is not encapsulated within Aether units, then there is no visible (electromagnetic) matter.

Different regions of the Universe have varying densities of dark matter available, which may become fuel for generating new visible matter. Thus, the observations of galactic clusters would tell us that underlying the galactic cluster is a vast region of space possessing a large deposit of dark matter. Conversely, regions of space devoid of visible matter and relativistic effects must be lacking in dark matter density.

As for "dark energy," that is a misnomer. There is no such "thing" as "visible energy," let alone "dark energy." Energy is a unit of work. Energy is real as a property of matter, but it is not a material thing of itself. One cannot make something material from a substance called energy. Matter can only be built from matter. Visible matter can be built from dark matter, and it can be unraveled. But energy is only the movement of matter, and matter must possess the dimension of mass.

Many scientists are fooled into thinking dark energy is some kind of hidden light because energy is often used as a synonym for visible light. Light is electromagnetic radiation, or a manifestation of mass momentum within the fabric of Aether. Dark matter does not exist within the Aether fabric, but rather has its existence outside of the Aether. Therefore, dark matter has no electric or magnetic properties and cannot be a type of electromagnetic radiation in any form.

According to the Aether Physics Model, dark matter is properly defined and quantified as strings of mass. If the strings of mass are moving relative to the Aether, such as neutrinos being released from beta decay neutrons, then it can be said that dark matter possesses the property of energy. But it is inappropriate to describe the energy as something separate from the dark matter, itself. There is only dark matter, whether it is moving or not.

So the ever expanding and contracting Universe is driven by the continual process of visible matter converting to dark matter, and dark matter converting back to visible matter. Whether the Universe appears to be expanding or contracting depends upon where you are looking.

The Higgs Boson is difficult to detect! Therefore it must be lighter?

Experiments at Fermilab have narrowed the range of possible masses for the Higgs Boson – the elusive particle that physicists hope to see for the first time at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The results rule out about one quarter of the previous mass range for the Higgs and boost the chances that it will be rather lightweight – and therefore more difficult to detect.

Maybe the Higgs Boson does not exist?

The failure of the Standard Model rests in its wrong assumptions. Physicists assume that all matter is solid and physical, and therefore particles that make up other particles must necessarily be smaller, solid, physical particles.

They believe this despite clear evidence that the electron is cloud-like in its structure. Physicists even have to quantify the structure of the electron in terms of probability functions, and actually believe the electron is a crap shot.

The Standard Model does not allow for the concept of different orders of reality, which lead from physical matter to non-material existence. In the end, however, that is exactly what physicists will have to admit.

The Aether Physics Model uses quantum dimensional analysis to induce that primary angular momentum is actually a state of matter, or more accurately, the transition state of matter as it evolves from non-material structure to physical structure.

The Aether Physics Model also shows that mass is a property, not a physical thing. Mass is a property of matter, just as are the properties of length, frequency, and charge. The so-called "god particle" simply does not exist.

Electrons and protons are a transition state of reality where non-material Aether (quantum rotating magnetic field) captures dark matter and convert's it to visible matter.

Outside of Aether, dark matter possesses the property of mass but does not possess the property of charge. Therefore, dark matter appears invisible to visible matter.

When protons and neutrons are destroyed in a collision, the so-called "quarks" are merely the last moments of an Aether unit being destroyed, and the primary angular momentum of the subatomic particle transiting back to dark matter. That is why the hypothetical sea of quarks has ever been observed. It is also why the hypothetical Higgs Boson will never be observed.

The paradigm of the Standard Model bases upon false assumptions, which is why the Standard Model has so many dead ends and paradoxes.

Metaphysics and Physics

Underlying all physical existence is non-material existence. What is non-material existence? Magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, and gravitational fields are all measurable and yet non-material forms of existence. Velocity is measurable, and yet it is non-material. There are more forms of measurable and experiential non-material existence than there are physical objects.

Metaphysics is the scientific study of non-material reality. Just as physical existence is systematically studied through mathematics in physics, we can also devise a mathematically-based system of study for metaphysics. In fact, much of physics is already about studying non-material reality.

Where modern physics fails, however, is at its most fundamental level. It turns out the dimension of charge is improperly notated in our system of physics. Instead of a single dimension of charge being related to a single dimension of mass, all charge should be distributed relative to the dimension of mass. When this, and several resulting errors are corrected, a proper system of physics emerges, which allows us to measure non-material things such as feelings.

It is in the realm of feelings, which the mind has direct control of, where we can develop abilities exceeding our mechanical abilities.

The science for understanding metaphysics is being developed and published freely online. The study is open to collaboration and independent research. For an introduction to the sciences of Metaphysics and Physics as seen through the proper scientific paradigm, please read the book posted online at www.metaphysics-and-physics.com.

Aether Structures in Light? Who would have thought?

The Aether Physics Model induces the geometry of a quantum Aether unit as a tubular loxodrome. The Aether unit encapsulates dark matter to produce electrons and protons. The Aether unit also carries angular momentum from electrons and positrons, which is a photon. That is, photons have the geometry of Aether units.

Naturally, it was just a matter of time before scientists discovered that photons and light have the geometry of Aether units. That is exactly what appears to be the case as posted in a recent article on Live Science. The so-called "knots" are identical to Aether unit geometry.

In an earlier story on Live Science, it was shown that light in nanoscale structures exhibits force. This is evidence for the electron-positron angular momentum stored in photons. The electron-positron angular momentum activates the Aether's electrostatic and electromagnetic dipoles. By manipulating the angles of photons, one can create both attractive and repulsive forces between photons.