Thursday, June 28, 2018

Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says

Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says:



This is my response, which I posted to the article:

Man, do they have it wrong! First, the Sun isn't just hydrogen and helium. Every star, and every hot planet, has a neutron core. Neutron core's are extremely radioactive. Astrophysicists know that after a supernova, when the main body of a star is blasted into space, a neutron core is all that survives. Our star is no different. Read the life work of Oliver Manuel to understand how stars are truly composed and how they actually operate.

Second, it takes a lot of energy to create and sustain these plasmas. The theory is that once the plasma get's started, it will be self-sustaining. Yet, the s
o-called fusion bombs were not self-sustaining. If they were, our planet would have turned into a mini star by now due to all the hydrogen bombs that were detonated.

Third, they have the physics wrong. Fusion is not a process where free floating atoms are stuck together through magnetic pinching. The Universe is not a giant Lego kit where scientists can put pieces together and make their own frankenstein. The Universe is a constantly creating machine of living processes, and not all life is cellular; life processes occur even at the subatomic level. The physics for creating matter has been touched on in the discovery and experiments relating to the Casimir effect, but the scientific community dismisses that the created matter is real. They call the created matter "virtual" because it doesn't fit with their limited postulates about how the Universe works. They can't fathom that the boundary of the Universe extends beyond physical matter and into non-material existence.

Fusion is a process similar to the Casimir effect, but it occurs between protons instead of electrons, and it occurs inside of atoms. There is no such thing as either fission or fusion, at least not as the concepts are envisioned by today's academics. Instead, there is a change of distance between protons inside the atom, which activates protons to vibrate the space between them and to generate a proton-sized photon. If there is an empty shell position inside the atom, the photon will be converted into a proton via an effect similar to the photoelectric effect (where a photon acts on a valence position in the outer shells of the atom to produce an electron). This added proton in the nucleus can either cause the atom to split, or it can generate another proton-sized photon inside the atom, but where much of the angular momentum escapes the nucleus and some of it produces an electron; the proton and electron then combine to produce a neutron.

In any case, the ideal situation for generating atomic reactions is inside heavy elements, and not in trying to stick two protons together in open space. And no matter how you make atomic reactions, you are always creating new matter and new energy. This is the mechanism that keeps the Universe expanding. It is also the mechanism that makes stars and planets grow in size over time. It is the mechanism whereby the Sun can release energy even as it grows over time. It is the mechanism that causes a nuclear reactor to produce more fuel than it consumes (bet you didn't know that, because this information is kept secret). At the root of it all, all matter is bred by converting dark matter into visible matter.

Scientists know that the mass of most galaxies is mostly due to dark matter, and they know that the Universe is expanding, and they know that nuclear reactors produce more fuel (more mass) than they consume, and they know the Earth and Stars are growing from within, and they know the Casimir effect generates lots of new photons and electrons, and yet they still can't put the pieces of the physics puzzle together right. Seventy years of fusion research failure is not enough to make them look at alternative theories. And yet, I have figured out the simple dimensinal analysis and Newtonian force equations that show how this all works.

The old-timer scientists are a lost cause, but I hope that younger and more open minds will someday look more closely at my work, and help me fix all the mistakes made during the past 100 years by paternalistic, masters of the Universe egos. You can read my work at sota.aetherwizard.com.

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

David Thomson's answer to What is an electron probability cloud? - Quora

Modern physics is stuck in the four-dimensional perspective of space-time due to their reliance on four-dimensional instrumentation. Although the data from a four dimensional perspective is useful and valid, it needs to be conceptualized from a five-dimensional perspective to be fully understood.



David Thomson's answer to What is an electron probability cloud? - Quora:



'via Blog this'

Saturday, May 19, 2018

What Can the Death of a Neutron Tell Us About Dark Matter?

I don't understand why they (physicists) don't admit that anti-neutrinos are dark matter? When a neutron decays, the total angular momentum of the neutron, minus the angular momenta of the resulting proton and electron, leaves an angular momentum value equal to about 1.5 times the angular momentum of the electron. This angular momentum that is 1.5 times the angular momentum of the electron is the anti-neutrino. 



I explain this in greater detail in Secrets of the Aether under the subheading of Neutrino.

The fact that a particle with more mass than the electron just disappears without interacting further with visible matter is very strong evidence for dark matter. This is exactly how dark matter is expected to behave. So why is the anti-neutrino not considered to be dark matter?



What Can the Death of a Neutron Tell Us About Dark Matter?:



'via Blog this'

Monday, April 02, 2018

On the Importance of the Five Dimensional Aether in Understanding Reality

Max:
Why Do Interpretations Of Quantum Physics Matter?

A couple of weeks ago, fellow Forbes blogger Ethan Siegel took to his keyboard with the goal of making me sigh heavily, writing a post about interpretations of quantum physics calling the idea that you need an interpretation "the biggest myth in quantum physics." Ethan's argument boils down to noting that all of the viable interpretations known at present make identical predictions about the probability of getting particular outcomes for any experiment we might do. Therefore, according to Ethan, there's no need for any interpretation, because it doesn't really matter which of them you choose.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2018/02/27/why-do-interpretations-of-quantum-physics-matter/#7f7246fb7d57

There is no viable logic in his article if the foundations of the physics he uses to interpret an experiment are in error. For example, what if the whole paradigm of particles and waves as descriptors of the structures of subatomic particles is flawed and just plain incorrect? What if a subatomic particle's structure is actually a quasi-material structure that we could call, "primary angular momentum?" Such a structure could exist if the structure of space (Aether) is a five-dimenstional (3L / 2T) quantum rotating magnetic field and the subatomic particle is merely a string of mass (dark matter) caught up in the quantum rotating magnetic field. Thus dark matter would be "converted" to appear as visible matter, particularly if the quantum rotating magnetic field structure imparted the properties of electrostatic and magnetic charge to the string of mass.

A string of mass moving at a velocity through this quantum rotating magnetic field in a five dimensional frame of reference could easily be mistaken for being either a particle or a wave, especially to a bunch of mathematicians ignorant of the actual structure of the subatomic particles and the five-dimensional reference frame they exist in. 

The weirdness of the Standard Model is rooted in the limited choice between particle and wave, and the ignorance if the other temporal dimension. In fact, the ignorance of the Standard Model is further rooted in the incomplete understanding of the temporal nature of the Universe. Time is just a subset of a greater collection of temporal attributes, just as length and area are a subset of "volume." The temporal dimensions as a whole are what physicists refer to as "spin." This "spin" has a forward AND backward time frequency as well as a right and left spin direction. Due to the half spin nature of the electron and proton, subatomic particles only "see" a single time direction and a single spin direction. The space (Aether unit) that contains the subatomic particle, however, sees a two spin point of view, which forever oscillates between forward and backward time, and right and left spin, at an extreme (and quantifiable) frequency. 

It is the half spin of subatomic particles that gives matter the appearance of moving in the forward direction of time. And yet, despite the forward advance in time associated with matter, our mind always remains right here and right now... in the present. Our mind is the reference point that perceives the advancement of time. The mind does not move through time; it ever remains in the present, and in the exact same present as every other mind. 

In the Standard Model, time is believed to be an independent metric, and it is also believed our mind traverses through time along with matter. The spin nature of subatomic particles is considered "weird" and is subsequently discarded from our understanding. Also, the concept of Aether is discarded as being unnecessary because four-dimensional, forward-time matter has been arbitrarily chosen as the only reality the physicists are interested in. Aside from the fact that evidence for the Aether's existence abounds in physics, the Aether as a five-dimensional coordinate system is required in order to understand the hidden aspects of quantum structure and also quantum mechanics. 

The problem with physics isn't the physics, it is the physicists, and it always has been. All of humanity is living in a deep ignorance concerning the true nature of our four-dimensional realm. To get a glimpse of this perspective, imagine life in a television world. Television worlds are three-dimensional, having two dimensions of length and one dimension of time. The characters live out a scripted life written from players in the four-dimensional world of space-time. Well, our four-dimensional lives are written by players in the five-dimensional realm of space-resonance. All those players in our four-dimensional world who claim to see ghosts, spirit guides, and angels, and who practice religions based on the afterlife, and who practice magic or experience paranormal events, they are all interacting with, or merely believing in, the greater five dimensional realm. And just as our four-dimensional world seems infinitely more vast than the area-time television world, the five dimensional realm is infinitely more vast than our four-dimensional, space-time realm.

The Rosetta Stone for understanding this greater five-dimensional realm is quantum physics, but we will never make progress in this understanding as long as physicists continue with their nonsense of probability functions as subatomic particles, and their flat out denial of Aether. 

Saturday, March 17, 2018

More about the Aether that isn't an Aether.

Here we are, back to scientists describing the Aether that isn't an Aether.

"...empty space isn't really empty, but instead populated with 'virtual particles.' These particles are artifacts of the fact, described by quantum mechanics, that physics is governed more by probabilities than fixed realities. Because of the small possibility that a particle might exist in any one empty point in space, that empty point in space acts as if the particle is sort of, kind of there. And those virtual particles have real effects on the world."

Since when does a mathematical probability function become a physical fact in the real Universe? What the scientists are not saying, and which the real facts allude, is that there is a very real, non-material structure to the fabric of space. Space is not a physical substance, like matter, but rather a non-material structure that gives rise to magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, and gravitational fields (all of which are non-material realities). Even the spin property of subatomic particles, and the speed limit of light are functions of the space the subatomic particles reside in.

What the scientists are close to discovering is that black holes are not physical objects such as the much touted super massive black holes, but rather black holes are regions near the centers of galaxies where the structure of space collapses, and visible matter is converted to dark matter. And yes, space can become (and is) polarized in such a way as to prevent the entire galaxy from unraveling.

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Most images of black holes are illustrations. Here’s what our telescopes actually capture. - Vox

Astrophysicists believe the only viable explanation for black holes is that there has to be a super massive, highly condensed piece of matter hidden in space.



This is not the only explanation, and neither is it the best explanation. The best explanation is that at the centers of galaxies space is unraveling. Space has structure, which is quantifiable, as I have shown in Secrets of the Aether. When space becomes too dense, it just unravels, and it unravels any matter that is within it. The unraveled matter converts from visible matter to dark matter, and radiates outward from the center of the galaxy as neutrinos.



Think of a large bathtub with a drain. As the water goes down the drain, all the other water in the tub migrates toward the drain. If there is something floating in the water, it may get close to the vortex of the drain, and be shot back out before actually heading straight into the vortex at a later time. This gives the appearance of being gravitationally attracted toward the vortex. You can imagine the vortex of a bathtub as having imaginary mass and design a whole set of equations to explain the action of the vortex in terms of Newton's gravitational laws. But this would be nothing more than an imaginary exercise, even though the math will work.



There are no super massive black bodies in the centers of galaxies. There is a drain of space, and every star is migrating toward the drain, which explains the inward spiral nature of galaxies and the observed behavior of stars "orbiting" the center.