Thursday, June 05, 2014

Geophysicists Discover How Rocks Produce Magnetic Pulses — The Physics arXiv Blog — Medium

Geophysicists Discover How Rocks Produce Magnetic Pulses 



The "electron pair holes" and "positive holes" described in semiconductor physics and mentioned in the above article is just another way of discussing Aether.



In order for a "hole" or "empty space" to possess charge, that space must have structure and obey mechanical laws. Such a structure can hardly be called non-existent or imaginary. It is a very real structure even if it is non-material in nature.



In several areas of physics, the existence of Aether is denied despite the observations of magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, frame dragging, positive holes, electron pair holes, solitons, space-time curvature, and numerous other measurable phenomena.

Friday, March 21, 2014

Double Flares May Offer Insights to Tunneling

The article, Double Flare, on spaceweather.com is an interesting story and I believe it offers insight into what happens with magnetism at the quantum scale.



Just as two sunspots can be connected by a seemingly invisible magnetic loop, magnetic structures at all scales can connect in similar ways.



In the Aether Physics Model, I show a simplified structural model for a quantum of space (Aether unit) and also for quantum particles such as the electron and proton. Aether units are essentially perpetual, dynamic rotating magnetic fields. The rotating magnetic field manifests as a tube of magnetic flux. These magnetic flux tubes can form macro structures, similar to water molecules forming oceans.



Further, tubes of magnetic flux can stretch over great distances causing various magnetic structures to be connected. To some degree, all things throughout the Universe are magnetically connected but at various magnitudes.



Certain systems, such as a human body, likely have very rich magnetic connections among its parts even if the magnetic fields are relatively weak compared to other magnetic fields. The magnetism need not manifest as a single coherent magnetic field such as in a permanent magnet or sunspot connections, but biomagnetism could exist as a network of much weaker magnetic fields. Each cell in the body, and each molecule in each cell, is likely in communication with and connected to each other, much like the sunspots on the Sun.



I like how the article starts, "Long ago researchers thought solar flares were isolated events." This is another way of saying, "Mainstream science had it wrong just ten years ago." There is nothing bad about being wrong, but it is another reminder that mainstream science paradigms have a long way to go before they can be considered accurate models of reality.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Yellowstone Releasing Ancient Helium, Scientists Discover

Yellowstone Releasing Ancient Helium, Scientists Discover:



This is an interesting story. The facts are that more helium than is expected is coming up from Yellowstone volcano. The article is written such that it sounds like an absolute certainty that this helium is millions, if not billions of years old, as though this could be ascertained.



Let us assume, however, that the helium has been recently produced deep in the Earth. The evidence to suggest this assumption is that the Earth is measured to be expanding by 19 cubic kilometers of material per year, and numerous volcanoes all around the planet have awakened from 10,000 year dormancy, and other volcanoes are erupting more than usual.



This may actually suggest the Earth is going through a phase of rapid matter generation deep underground. The exceptionally high helium production shows that processes generating new protons are occurring all around the planet.



It is my suspicion that a rapid material production is occurring due to a change in the density of space as the Earth passes through the Milky Way magnetic plane. This causes the distance between protons in certain atoms to move within range to generate new protons from the Aether.



Mainstream physics only recognizes this process with regard to electrons, however, I have a mathematical basis for suspecting that protons produce proton-sized photons inside atoms during hot and cold fusion processes. The increase of helium could very well be evidence in favor of my physics theories.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Amazing! First ever photograph inside a hydrogen atom | Fox News

Be careful of what is published as fact.

Amazing! First ever photograph inside a hydrogen atom | Fox News:

There is a problem with this photo.  The electron is not a particle and neither is it a wave.  It merely behaves as both simultaneously.  The electron's actual structure is characterized by the unit of angular momentum.  The photo represents the assumptions of the scientists and not an actual image of an atom.  The photo is a computer generated image based upon interpretations of interference patterns.  If the interpretation assumptions are changed, then the photo will change, too. 

Monday, April 15, 2013

A second Higgs boson? Physicists debate new particle

It seems that every month there is someone trying to baffle the world with bullshit with regard to science.  Whether it be about the latest energy field tunneling through the (name a scientist) plasma causing black holes to emerge dark matter particles, or dark matter energy fields flowing through the (name a scientist) plasma induced black holes, or the black hole plasma field of the (name a scientist) field causing dark matter particles, people seem to soak it up as though they understand it because Joe Schmoe understands it.

Here is the latest nonsense being served in the mass media:
Physicists confirmed in March that a new particle discovered at the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is, in fact, the Higgs boson. This particle, which weighs about 126 times the mass of a proton, appears to fit the Standard Model of physics, the dominant theory of particle physics. In this model, the Higgs boson is related to the Higgs field, an energy field that pervades space and is thought to imbue many particles with mass. The thinking goes that just as swimmers would get wet moving through a pool, as particles move through the Higgs field they would gain mass.
Read more
The usual Higgs nonsense about an invisible particle with 126 times the mass of the proton was discovered by a 10 billion dollar science experiment leads the reader to discover that there may be up to five flavors of these massive and invisible particles.  Presumably, these theoretical particles are just in reach of our understanding if we can spend just X billion dollars more.

This certainly ranks among the biggest frauds in humanity.  Not only does this science make no sense (as does most of modern fundamental physics), but it is blatantly obvious that the scientists are seeing whatever they need to see in order to keep the paychecks flowing.

The idea that a massless thing gains mass by moving through an empty space of mass is an obvious logical fallacy.  To begin with, a massless thing can have no momentum to displace something with mass.  The idea that mass is something that moves at all is also a fallacy since mass is a property of something, just as is length.  To illustrate this, hold up two fingers in front of you.  The distance between those two fingers has length.  The length is measurable even if there is no physical object between the fingers.  Length is a property, not a physical thing.

Mass is a property.  Mass gives matter its momentum, but matter is not mass and mass is not matter.  Mass is a non-material idea.  There is no imaginary or real particle that gives a thing its mass.  It simply is.  The idea of the Higgs Boson is a fairy tale ... a fantasy.  There is no particle or field that gives anything the property of mass.

The proton certainly does not get its mass from something 126 times greater in magnitude than itself.  What do the scientists say happens to the rest of the 125 parts of the Higgs Boson?  Why is something of greater magnitude harder to see than something of lesser magnitude?

And then there is the perennial nonsense of the "energy field."  Energy is merely a unit of work.  What specifically is working to produce this energetic field?  If they are saying the energy is inherent to the field, then they are talking about an Aether.  And if they are going to talk about an Aether, they need to quantify this Aether and show how it relates to matter.  This is exactly what the Aether Physics Model is about.

However, the Aether Physics Model is very simple and fully explained in Classical Mechanics terms.  The fundamental forces are unified simply using Newtonian type equations.  There is no need to waste billions of dollars trying to prop a failed particle zoo when more useful results can be obtained for much less investment.

Monday, September 10, 2012

Calculations of the Unified Force Theory

One of my papers, Calculations of the Unified Force Theory, has been entered into a contest at FQXi.org.  The winning essay will be published in Scientific American.  For those who are interested, the paper can be viewed at:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1531

There is also an opportunity for readers to vote on the paper and post comments.

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

The Higgs Boson (Field) is a Massive Fraud

Understanding the Higgs boson | Cutting Edge - CNET News:


This is absurdity to the extreme.  They are saying the Higgs is both a boson (particle) and field (space).  Now in addition to wave/particle duality we have space/particle duality.  An object can be both a thing and the space it occupies at the same time.  They have now defined space as matter, or at least as the source of matter.  Actually, what they have done is sunk deeper into the cloud of ignorance in order to justify spending billions of dollars on a failed experiment.

Let me also put it to you another way.  They are saying that some cosmic process is using cosmic construction paper for cutting out a particle that wastes more than 99% of the paper.  That is what a proton is to the Standard Model.  What happens to the rest of the Higgs field and why does it not affect macro matter if it can affect quantum matter?  When 1% of the Higgs is used to make a proton, what happens to the other 99%?

If that 99% produces another proton, then the Higgs obviously no longer has the mass discovered by CERN!  If that 99% does not produce a proton, it means there is a lot of unused Higgs field that can affect other protons.  The logic clearly does not work.

They have not only "discovered" a new particle, they have "discovered" a whole new reality that is nothing like the reality the rest of the world experiences.  

What's more, this Higgs field is said to be the source of mass.  Mass is a dimension, like length and time.  It is not a physical object.  Just look at any unit.  The unit of energy is equal to mass times length squared divided by time squared.  Mass is not a field any more than length is a field; or time is a field.  

When you see how big the CERN facility is and how many people work there, you can see that the outcome was predetermined.  A study should be commissioned The Hto examine how many people had to be demoted and fired in order for the data to produce positive results.