Sunday, September 11, 2005
Sunday, September 04, 2005
1 September 2005
Dear Dr Thomson
TITLE: A new foundation of
AUTHORS: Dr David W Thomson et al
Thank you for your submission to New Journal of Physics. However, we do
not publish this type of article in any of our journals and so we are unable to
consider your article further.
Thank you for considering New Journal of
Senior Publishing Administrator
New Journal of
Friday, August 26, 2005
Monday, August 22, 2005
Evidence for the Existence of God
Lately there have been several people demanding of others proof for the existence of a Creator God. Quoting from another poster to this newsgroup, Einstein said, "Certain it is that a conviction, akin to religious feeling, of the rationality and intelligibility of the world lies behind all scientific work of a higher order. The firm belief, which is bound up with deep feeling, in a superior mind revealing himself in the world of experience, represents my conception of God, which may, therefore be described in common parlance as `pantheistic' (Spinoza)." (FROM: Einstein, The World as I See It, London, 1955, p. 131.
Searching Google we see that Pantheism is the belief that God exists within the world, being both the Creator and the created. So, if God truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is the very foundation upon which physical existence evolved.
Physicists are smart. If such evidence were present, certainly Albert Einstein and others who held Pantheistic beliefs would have found such evidence. But what if certain facts weren’t known during Einstein’s time? What if physics itself was founded with a couple errors, minor, but significant?
Coulomb’s constant and Newton’s gravitational constant were known to a fair degree of accuracy in Einstein’s time. But the speed of light, permeability constant, and permittivity constant were not known so accurately. Nor did physics ever discover the conductance constant of free space and find its use. But had Einstein had access to these accurate constants, he would have noticed the following relationship involving Coulomb’s constant:
k.C = c * Cd * u.0 / e.0
Where k.C is Coulomb’s constant, c is the speed of light, Cd is the conductance constant (2.112 x 10^-4 Siemens), u.0 is the permeability constant, and e.0 is the permittivity constant. Einstein would then have marveled at the construction of Coulomb’s constant in terms of other absolute constants. He might also have realized that if the conductance constant were multiplied by the angular momentum of subatomic particles that it would give a value expressed in dimensions of distributed charge.
h * Cd = e.emax^2
where h is Planck’s “quantum of action” constant, and e.emax^2 is expressed in dimensions of coulombs squared. The value of e.emax^2 is greater than that of e^2, where e is the elementary charge. This simple observation would have led Einstein to the Unified Force Theory, which he spent most of his later years trying to discover.
Had Planck’s constant, the mass of the electron, the speed of light, and the Compton wavelength been known with the accuracy we have today, Planck’s constant would have acted as the Rosetta stone, which would have unlocked great mysteries in quantum physics. Today, Planck’s constant can be accurately expressed as:
h = m.e * w.C * c
where h is Planck’s constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is the Compton wavelength, and c is the speed of light. From the above equality, we can postulate that the mass of an electron is a quantum mass, the Compton wavelength is the quantum length, and the speed of light is the quantum velocity. Dividing c by w.C, we can deduce the result to be the quantum frequency.
c / w.C = F.q
where F.q is the quantum frequency.
“Quantum” is not necessarily the smallest piece of something, it is the smallest whole piece, which remains stable. So the quantum length and quantum frequency, if they are truly so, will be the length and frequency used by God to measure and build the physical Universe. They should be the rod and clock standards to which all existence is made. We can do a simple test to see if these are indeed the quantum length and frequency. We can factor all quantum constants by these quantum measurements and we should see a precise construction of the constants from them.
For example, let us take Coulomb’s constant.
k.C = m.e * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.emax^2
In the above equality, Coulomb’s constant is shown to be exactly constructed from the mass of the electron, quantum length cubed, quantum frequency squared, and strong charge of the electron (as shown above).
We can do the same thing for Newton’s gravitational constant.
G = w.C^3 * F.q^2/ m.a
Where G is the gravitational constant, and when G is factored by w.C^3 * F.q^2 then m.a is equal to 3.268 x 10^15 kg. This mass, when thoroughly examined, is the mass associated with the Aether. This mass, it turns out, is reciprocal mass. Just as time is linear, but its reciprocal is a cycle, mass is linear, but its reciprocal is also a cycle. And since mass is the dimension that when given a quantity measures inertia, the mass associated with the Aether is inertia that cycles between positive inertia and negative inertia. Thus, the net mass when measured is zero. We see reciprocal mass in mechanical devices, too. A steam engine piston cycles through positive inertia followed by negative inertia. The net inertia of the piston after one full cycle is zero. The same thing happens with the mass associated with the Aether.
It turns out that this mass associated with the Aether is not just floating around, isolated from other dimensions. This mass is part of a massive Gforce, which gave rise to the Aether. This Gforce is also the driver behind the three other forces of electrostatic force, electromagnetic force (same as strong force), and gravitational force. The so-called weak nuclear force is merely the proportion of electrostatic force to electromagnetic force. This Gforce has the quantum measurement structure of:
Gforce = m.a * w.C * F.q^2
Gforce = 1.210 x 10^44 newton
The Gforce is indeed a huge value. When we look at the gravitational constant in terms of Gforce, we get:
G = Gforce * w.C^2 / m.a^2
The Newton gravitational constant is equal to the Gforce acting on a quantum surface per quantum distributed Aether mass.
Just as the strong charge of the electron was found to be equal to the angular momentum of the electron (Planck’s constant) times the conductance of the Aether, we can determine the strong charge associated with the Aether in the same way:
e.a^2 = m.a * w.C * c * Cd
e.a^2 = 5.021 x 10^8 coul^2
And just as we expressed Coulomb’s constant in terms of electron mass and electron strong charge, we can do the same with the Aether mass and strong charge:
k.C = m.a * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.a^2
Now if we use the same structure as the equation with the Newton gravitational constant and Gforce, we would see how the Gforce produces the Aether unit constant:
A.u = Gforce * w.C^2 / e.a^2
The Aether unit relates to Coulomb’s constant as:
A.u = 16pi^2 * k.C
Just as the gravitational constant mediates the force between masses, and the Coulomb constant mediates the force between electrostatic charges, the Aether unit mediates the force between electromagnetic (strong) charges.
Look close at the equations for the gravitational constant and Aether unit constant. The equations are the same, except that gravitational constant is Gforce acting on surface per distributed mass and the Aether unit is equal to Gforce acting on surface per distributed charge. And since there is only one quantum length and one quantum frequency, and the angular momentum of the Aether or subatomic particle is essentially set by its mass, then the strong charge associated with any mass will always be directly proportional to the mass. This also means that the strong force will always be directly proportional to the gravitational force. This constant mass to strong charge ratio clearly states that strong charge is caused by angular momentum moving through the conductance of the Aether.
We can see from the above equation that Gforce acting upon surface per strong charge is what causes the Aether unit. And if the dimensions of the Aether unit are carefully examined, they are equal to the unit of rotating magnetic field. So a quantum unit of Aether is a quantum rotating magnetic field. By analyzing the Aether in terms of the masses of the electron and proton, we can deduce the geometrical structure of the Aether.
But what is important for now, is that the gravitational constant, which is directly a result of Gforce, mediates the gravitational force of all linear mass. Also, the Coulomb constant, which is a substructure of the Aether unit, mediates the electrostatic force. And of course, the strong force is mediated by the Aether unit, which is directly manifested by the Gforce.
Modern physics does not recognize the strong charge of the electron, nor does it recognize a strong force for the electron. And yet, the Casimir equation is the same thing as the strong force equation for the electron.
According to Hendrick Casimir, the Casimir equation is written as:
pi * h * c * A / 480 * L^4 = F
where h is Planck’s constant, c is the speed of light, A is the area of the plates the force is acting upon, L is the distance between the plates, and F is the resulting force. Who knows where Casimir got the value of 480 from? In 1996, Stephen Lamoreaux measured the Casimir force to within 5% of the predicted value. The numerical part of Casimir’s equation is suspect. We can see that the value of pi / 480 is 3.3% different from 16pi^2. Changing the pi / 480 term to 16pi^2 gets us closer to the measured value of the Casimir force. So by taking the special case of the Casimir force where the area is equal to the quantum length squared and the distance between the plates is also equal to the quantum length, we can rewrite Casimir’s expression as:
h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4
Using the quantum measurements, we can devise a quantum unit of force equal to:
forc = m.e * w.C * F.q^2
forc = .034 newton
So Casimir’s equation can be written as:
h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc
We can further modify the equation by replacing h * c / 16pi^2 with k.C * e.emax^2 and simplify to:
k.C * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc
We can further replace the Coulomb constant with the Aether unit constant and get:
A.u * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = forc
The last equation is the strong charge equation for the electron, which calculates the strong force between electrons. So, despite the denials of modern physics, the Casimir equation is, in fact, proof that the electron does experience the strong force.
But most important, we see that all the forces are unified through a single Gforce. And since the Gforce acts with the force of 1.210 x 10^44 newton of reciprocal force in each quantum of existence, and the entire physical Universe is made up of nearly infinite quantum Aether units, we could easily say that the Gforce is all powerful and all pervading. We could also say that the Gforce creates space-time, and thus creates the environment for subatomic particles, which are themselves the beginning of physical matter. We could also say that the Gforce is the one force that creates all the forces by acting on different aspects of subatomic existence.
If God is described as being the Creator of the physical world, and is said to be all powerful, all encompassing, and present in all creation, the Gforce could certainly be called “God”. And thus, we have mathematical equations, based upon empirical data, that offer very clear evidence that God did create the physical Universe and resides in that creation even today. So for those of you who ask to see the evidence of equations and empirical data that God created the physical, you now have it.
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
1) Is the momentum of the Aether a state of directional (laminar enveloping) or radial flow (possibly both ?) from an epicenter; or is it a self enveloping state such as that of a water boil chaotic state. (disregard any inference of matter or temperature).
When we think of momentum, we are taught to think of mass times velocity. Since mass is inertia, we could say that momentum is inertia that is moving. But many people also think of momentum as inertia that is not moving, or in other words, momentum and inertia appear to them as the same thing. Similarly, acceleration is sometimes thought of as a kind of momentum, as is energy, force, and angular momentum.
The Aether has many qualities, of which direction and radial flow both apply. In fact, the Aether is the unit of existence in which ALL the various qualities of existence come together at once. This can be seen in that the Aether unit has one dimension of mass, two dimensions of frequency, three dimensions of length, and four dimensions of charge. Every possible combination of dimensions that produce the units of existence we are familiar with (momentum, force, energy, etc.) exists within the Aether unit.
Most people understand how a single dimension of length (line), two dimensions of length (surface or area), and three dimensions of length (volume) are various manifestations of the dimension of length. Each new dimension is orthogonal (at right angles) to the other. There can only be three dimensions of length before all the orthogonal positions for length are taken.
As of this moment, there are extremely few people who understand the dimension of frequency and how it produces the illusion of linear time through half spin onta. The time dimension is then artificially imagined to be a real progression from a real past toward a real future. The concept of flow is thus seen as volume per time. But in reality, flow is volume that repeats itself (volume times frequency).
When we visualize volume per time, we tend to imagine a volume moving through linear time. And sure enough, if we open the faucet on our sink, we can conceptualize a volume of water emerging over time.
But at the quantum level, at the level of the Aether, there are two frequency dimensions, not one time dimension. One of the frequency dimensions alternates between forward and backward time. The other frequency dimension moves in either right or left spin time. Neither of these concepts are fully understood in modern physics, and yet they are foundational to the Aether Physics Model. In just the Aether unit, itself, all four of these combinations of frequency exist; forward-left spin, backward left-spin, forward right-spin, and backward right-spin. Of these four possibilities of frequency dimensions, we experience only one of them on a normal basis, the forward left-spin.
The above scenario is further complicated in that the Aether is polarized into two separate spheres of electrostatic charge. So the four spin positions above are duplicated on two separate spheres, resulting in a total of eight spin positions for dark matter to fill.
However, since onta cannot experience the forward time and backward time directions simultaneously, we can only see matter in four of the eight spin positions. Further, right hand spin (antimatter) and left hand spin (matter) spin positions annihilate each other, so we only experience two of the spin positions in our normal daily existence.
It is the forward left spin position of onta, on two different electrostatic spheres, that makes up almost every bit of the physical world we experience. These two spin positions produce the electron and proton. And since all these electrons and protons are spinning only in the forward direction of time, we perceive the illusion of linear time. To our perception, the electron and proton are dormant when the Aether is in backward time mode. Thus the onta (and all the forms they manifest) act like time diodes and show us a pulsed, linear forward time.
So back to your question about the momentum of the Aether. The Aether is perfectly balanced. There is no net momentum in the Aether because forward time is instantly alternated with backward time. From the perspective of the Aether, all existence is merely potential existence. To the Aether, there is no forward or backward flow of time, therefore there is no momentum, energy, or force as we perceive it. To the Aether, all exists as thoughts which are imagined. And in this sense, we can say that the Aether is not separate from the stuff our mind is made from.
So just as you can imagine walking and then make your body do the act, the Aether can imagine the Universe and make dark matter do the act, although it is not imagining on a personal level as we do. The imagination of the Aether takes place at a much more fundamental level of reality than does our human imagination.
So the momentum of the Aether has more of the quality of "willingness" than it does momentum of a material nature. In this sense, you could say it more resembles the boiling water analogy.
2) In a free state, is the Aether ever expanding or contracting, or is there a finite limit. If the is no finite limit , does the Aether envelope within itself to produce another state of physics beyond current thinking? (ie. Possibly another existing parallel universal system and /or alternate life forms of non-physical stature)
The Aether is ever expanding AND ever collapsing. At times there is more expanding taking place, at other times there is more collapsing taking place.
The Gforce acts on dimensions to produce Aether. The Casimir effect catalyzes both the creation of Aether and absorption of dark matter into the Aether. Thus the Casimir effect causes the physical Universe to expand. But as mass densities in the physical Universe become too great, portions of the physical Universe collapse as a black hole, tearing the Aether along with it. The Aether, being a rotating magnetic field, simply ceases to exist. The dark matter drains back into the great sea of dark matter where it will eventually be absorbed back into the Aether again.
Unless it is found that dark matter can be created, it would seem that the physical Universe is forever limited in how large it can become. Presently, between 70% and 95% of the total mass of the Universe is calculated to be dark matter and the Universe is expanding. This would imply we are in the early stages of Universe growth. At some point, when too much dark matter is embodied as onta, the Universe will tend to shrink for a long period of time. This process could go on through eternity, and likely has.
As for parallel universes, they may be possible. Our Universe is made up of just two out of eight spin positions. It is quite possible that there is another Universe made up of antimatter, and it would be visible to us since photons of matter and antimatter are identical. Then there is also the possibility that the backward time matter and antimatter make up two more physical universes. So there may be four distinct physical universes. We could prove this if entire galaxies consisting entirely of antimatter were discovered. I think it is likely they do exist.
3) Lastly, In a free state if the Aether envelopes within itself, is this an Aether point of momentum light variance that increases the occurrence potential to produce the detectable existence within the infinite various bands of the visible/non-visible light spectrum as the state passes within itself. (ex. Energetic waves in a bowl of water).
Aether, although it is non-material, has a very specific form of existence. The Aether existence precedes the existence of light and energy. Light and energy occur only after dark matter has been absorbed into the Aether. The Aether is pure potential. Everything that can possibly occur physically, must occur within the Aether.
However, the Aether is in no way a physical thing. It is the container in which physical existence might occur. This is not different from the mind. The mind is the container in which all concepts and emotions might occur, but the mind is neither concept nor emotion.
Thursday, June 02, 2005
In the second edition we identify the missing gravitational repulsion characteristic of matter. It turns out that gravitational repulsion takes place between matter and anti-matter. The photon as seen through the APM is the evidence for this hypothesis.
Also, the union of science and religion is even better explained in the second edition. More appropriately, it should be called the union of material and non-material existence. The APM shows how material existence evolved from non-material existence.
We will be releasing more information and updating the web site as time goes on.
Monday, April 11, 2005
Remember when Jon Lomberg and I were discussing how the Aether fabric should be represented? At that time I just didn't have enough data to work with to satisfy myself that I knew how it must structure itself. Then you suggested that the unified charge equation might be related to Einstein's GR field equation. Then I exchanged emails with a guy who built the world's largest plasma tube (known to the public) and he directed me to some pages on the Electric Sun theory and Plasma Universe theory. Now I'm building Naudin's lifter and all the pieces are coming together.
I can now present a working hypothesis for the Aether structure that incorporates GR, the unified charge equation, the Electric Sun theory, and the Plasma Universe theory. It also provides the mechanics for how electrostatic propulsion works. Once again, this hypothesis cannot be explained in any other way than with an understanding of the Aether.
I'll see if I can get MathCAD to generate the images I need to show the Aether fabric.
What is happening is that in a relaxed Aether, all the negative spheres are adjacent on all sides with positive spheres. This is an interlocked configuration, which would be expected for normal electrostatic attraction. But when a high potential DC charge is introduced, the Aether units shift into layers, rather than interlocked Aether units. It also causes the Aether to stretch, like pulling on a rubber sheet. But because the Aether units are now aligned with all negative spheres in a layer and all positive spheres in a layer, the Aether fabric also expands perpendicular to the axis of the high potential charge.
But since the positive and negative plates of the high potential are more or less localized, the effect is that the Aether units work together to produce what appears as a macro structure Aether unit. But high potential isn't the only way to produce a macro Aether unit structure. I'm sure you have seen the magnetic field lines of magnets. On a flat sheet of paper the magnetic flux lines appear to produce a figure 8 pattern; two adjacent circles. But in 3D they would be two adjacent spheres.
Strong electrostatic potentials and strong electromagnetic charges both would produce the same macro Aether structure.
We already presented the idea that folded Aether units within atoms have a pinching effect on the Aether. This pulls the Aether fabric toward a massive object, such as a star. But the stretching of the Aether also causes a strong electrostatic and electromagnetic effect around the star, as well.
Sometimes we see pictures of a helix pattern in solar prominences, Tesla coil streamers, or galactic "clouds". What we are looking at is a macro Aether structure in which matter (electrons and protons) are caught in the double loxodrome spin positions.
I'm looking forward to finishing the lifter experiment and applying this knowledge to the Alpha One experiment I have also nearly finished constructing.
Sunday, March 27, 2005
Sunday, February 20, 2005
Saturday, February 19, 2005
L = V/4piF^2
where V is the potential and F is frequency.
In the APM frequency squared is equal to the unit of resonance. So inductance would be measured as the potential per 4pi resonance. What this means is that there is a potential where resonance will occur in a given circuit. When that potential occurs and the system is resonant, the inductance will be equal to V/4piF^2.
I am reminded by Will Herzog that inductance meters work in this manner. Also, I recall that Nikola Tesla measured inductance using this same technique.
Monday, February 07, 2005
Contemplate the unit of force, for a moment. Force is equal to pressure times area, so when you press your finger against a surface, you are experiencing force. So press your finger against something right now and hold the pressure. Contemplate for a moment the nature of force.
Can you remove the force and separate it from your finger or the surface you are pressing? Focusing on the force, do you think the force is real? There is no question in our mind that force exists, yet when we look to see exactly what force is, there is nothing to see.
Similarly, we know that acceleration is real when we're falling out of a tree. We know the momentum is real as well as the velocity we are going when we hit the ground. We know that mass is real as we encounter the mass of the Earth. We know that the surface density and surface tension of the objects we hit is real. But where are these real units? Why can't we see them or put them in a jar? Modern science denies the existence of the Aether because they can't measure it. Of course, they measure the Aether all the time when they calculate the gravitational or electrostatic force, but they apparently do not know that. Modern physics believes that if it is not an observable particle, then there is no proof that it exists.
And yet, these same scientists have no problem believing in velocity, momentum, energy, or any other unit.
One of the benefits of the Aether Physics Model is that it corrects the structure of units by expressing all charge as distributed, just as Charles Coulomb explained it must be. When the units are expressed in the correct dimensions, they show a very clear structure, even though the structure is non-material in nature. Understanding this structure of the units gives great insights into physical processes and the overall structure of the Universe.
To my surprise, nobody has ever tried to categorize and systematically investigate all the units. As can be seen at the new page I posted today, the magnetic units do follow a very particular structure. Units have an obverse and inverse existence. All the electrical units fall in one column, the magnetic units in another column, and the stationary units in a third. The top row of units are all fields, or volumetric in nature. The second row are all surface related units, the third row are linear units, and the fourth row are root units. Certain units involve the 4pi constant, and they all fall in specific columns.
Some of the units have not been identified. Noting the pattern within the unit structure, it seems logical that all combinations of dimensions have a real world manifestation of some kind of unit. In order to better understand our world, we need to thoroughly investigate every unit and fully appreciate its manifestation. As I have begun to do this, I am pleasantly surprised to discover that understanding units is also a deep and rewarding metaphysical practice.
Just as we can contemplate a real, but non-material unit, we can appreciate that these non-material units have a lot in common with our non-material mind. The experience of force is not much different from the experience of a thought. The same goes for the experience of velocity, momentum, mass, energy, power, and all other units. We might focus our attention on an object, but our experience of the object always takes place through the units.
By understanding units in great detail, we not only understand the material Universe in which the units exist, but we also understand our experience of the Universe. The link between units and mind becomes delightfully clear and a sense of meaning manifests out of our understanding.
The Aether Physics Model is truly useful as a scientific tool as well as a spiritual path.
Sunday, January 30, 2005
The Aether Physics Model shows that all subatomic particles are magnetic. It is further reasoned that the net magnetic alignment of subatomic particles in an atomic nucleus contributes to a materials magnetism. Neutron stars, and their stronger versions, magnetars, are stellar bodies probably formed in the core of other stars during their lifetime. When the star explodes the dense neutron core remains. Our own Sun may have it's own small neutron core, which would drive its magnetic field. This could explain how the Sun flips its magnetic field every 11 years.
Of particular interest is the prevailing scientific belief that the magnetar's magnetic field develops from its spin. The faster the magnetar spins, the stronger its magnetic field would be, based on the Standard Model understanding of magnetism. But the SM does not present a theory for how an explosion, such as a Supernova, could increase the spin rate of a star's core. The Aether Physics Model suggests that the magnetic alignment of the neutrons means that their angular momentum is also aligned. Since the neutron angular momentum must exist within the Aether to maintain its spin, it is more likely that the Aether acting on a near perfect neutron "crystal" is what causes the spin. The larger and more perfect the neutron alignment is in the neutron star, the faster it will spin.
Thursday, January 06, 2005
According to the doctor, the leg is now showing signs of bone healing. This is only two weeks since the last visit and x-rays showed no healing at all. Since that time, I flipped the magnet under my leg to have the south side up, practiced focusing thoughts of healing on the magnetically treated water before drinking it (similar to Masaru Emoto), and increased my protein intake.
I can't say just how much healing is taking place because the surgeon didn't take x-ray photographs. Instead, he used a tool that allowed live examination with x-rays. In any case, the healing is progressing and there is no infection. I go back for a checkup in about 10 days.
Thanks to all who have said prayers for me, as I'm sure that also helped with the healing.
Sunday, January 02, 2005
In "Secrets of the Aether," several experiments are suggested that demonstrate the magnetic field is a function of Aether rather than onta (electrons and protons). For example, when a magnet is place with the north or south pole against a CRT (i.e. computer or TV screen) and twisted back and forth, the electron pattern does not move with the magnet, but remains steady. This is true whether the magnet is circular, square, or any other shape.
From these observations it can be deduced that the interplanetary magnetic field would exhibit a similar absolute reference with the Aether. It should be true that the Earth experiences some type of annual variation in its magnetic field with regard to the Sun's magnetic field.
As in the case of the magnets placed against a CRT, the Sun's magnetic field does not spin at the same rate as the Sun's rotation. The Sun rotates about its polar axis once every 28 days. Yet the Earth experiences a variation with respect to the Sun's magnetic field exactly once each year.
The following quote is from the Space Physics Text Book of Oulu.
"The annual geomagnetic variation relates to the Earth's orbit. Due to the 7.2 degrees tilt of the solar rotation axis with respect to the normal of ecliptic, the Earth reaches the highest northern and southern heliographic latitude (where solar wind speed is higher) on September 6 and March 5, respectively, and crosses the equator twice a year between these dates. Thus, when observed from Earth, one should expect a semiannual variation in solar wind speed with maxima around these dates. However, annual variation is often more clear (e.g., Bolton, 1990), and this is because the solar wind distribution is asymmetric or shifted with respect to equator (Zieger and Mursula, 1998). "
The lack of a clear semi-annual variation and a clearer annual variation supports the Aether Physics Model concept of magnetic fields. It would seem that the APM could be put to good use in astrophysics, perhaps helping to explain many of the mysteries still facing scientists today.