Hot Fusion Confusion

When researchers demonstrate cold fusion in their labs with real data, they are derided as being delusional cranks who don't understand physics. When hot fusion researchers spend a billion dollars on the brightest scientists and top technology to produce the theoretical hot fusion of the Standard Model and get zero results, then progress is being made because the money was successfully spent.

The New York Times released an article on May 26, 2009 titled In Hot Pursuit of Fusion (or Folly).

In February, NIF fired its 192 beams into its target chamber for the first time, and it now has the world’s most powerful laser, as well as the largest optical instrument ever built. But raising its energies still further to the point of ignition could take a year or more of experimentation and might, officials concede, prove daunting and perhaps impossible.

For all the hype about the success of the Standard Model, it is failing spectacularly. Billions of dollars, thousands of top scientists, and years of research and engineering are being wasted on Gravitational Wave detectors (I detect gravity waves with home built equipment) and Hot Fusion ignition.

The Aether Physics Model clearly shows fusion is actually a proton version of the Casimir effect. Two protons, held a quantum distance apart and magnetically aligned, cause the intervening Aether to oscillate and absorb a proton's quantity of dark matter to produce a proton. The initial state of this new creation is a proton-sized photon. In the Sun's corona, these photons radiate away as light. When the process occurs inside an atom, the photon is converted to a proton and actually increases the amount of matter in the Universe. Hence, stars literally grow in size, as do planets and other bodies in the Universe.

Plants and animals routinely convert atoms from one element to another via biological transmutations. By exchanging hydrogen and oxygen nuclei, plants and animals manufacture the elements they need by manipulating the atoms' geometry. That is why it takes so little heat for simple life forms to fuse or break apart atoms.

Simple life forms apparently have the ability to manipulate atomic structures. To compare the approach of a simple life form to a Standard Model scientist, the simple life form unlocks a padlock with a key, whereas the scientist attempts to blow it open with dynamite. The Aether Physics Model shows us the approach to atomic structures that nature uses, whereas the approach of the Standard Model is strictly destructive.

The Standard Model of physics does not recognize the geometry of subatomic particles or atoms. All matter is considered to be a trade off between the dimension of mass and the unit of energy. The Standard Model is merely a poetic theory, as opposed to the discrete theory of the Aether Physics Model.

Quantum Entanglement or Primary Angular Momentum

Photonics.com has published an article on quantum entanglement. Basically, they are saying quantum entanglement is modeled based upon the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP). The HUP is based upon Planck's constant, which in the Aether Physics Model, refers to a quantum quantity of primary angular momentum. When this quantum of primary angular momentum remains in a single Aether unit, it is a subatomic particle. When it explodes outward, it is an expanding wave of primary angular momentum and is called a photon.

The observation of Quantum Entanglement is evidence in favor of the APM model of the photon. According to the APM, the photon does not leave its source until its expanded angular momentum contacts another object, which then absorbs it.


The image shown comes from the photonics article. The depiction of quantum entanglement looks so similar to the expected photon of the Aether, that one must assume the two concepts are describing the same phenomenon.

The Standard Model derives the quantum entanglement idea from a mathematical probability theory, whereas the APM derives the photon structure from discrete physics.

Aether in Space is Fluid

The Aether Physics Model quantifies all space as Aether. The Aether has a quantum state, which is a quantum rotating magnetic field. The quantum Aether unit behaves like a solid, whereas the aggregate of Aether units behaves as fluid and gas. When excited, the Aether also behaves as a plasma.

Magnetic and electrostatic fields are structures of Aether units. These structures can be nanoscale small, or galactically huge. As space science develops, we are seeing more evidence demonstrating the electric and magnetic effects that Aether exhibits among planets, star systems, and galaxies.

UC Berkeley News reports that magnetic tornadoes have been observed in space. The THEMIS probe cluster has orbited through these magnetic tornadoes, which interact electrically with the Earth. Auroras are one manifestation of the magnetic tornadoes in space.

According to the UC Berkeley article, "Space tornadoes, however, generate huge amounts of electrical currents inside the funnel. These currents flow along twisted magnetic field lines from space into the ionosphere where they power several processes..."

Mainstream science tells us the Aether does not exist because it is not physical. However, mainstream science talks about "electrical currents" and "twisted magnetic field lines" as though they were physical objects. It is true that flowing electrons and charged particles can behave with the property of current, but current is not a physical object of itself. Also, magnetic field lines are considered by mainstream science to be mathematical structures, not physical structures. Like the Aether, magnetic flux lines are non-material. Students of the Aether Physics Model clearly understand that magnetic flux lines are Aether structures. So the acknowledgement of the reality of magnetic flux lines is the acknowledgement of the reality of Aether!

Mainstream science tells us there is no such thing as Aether, even though scientists talk about magnetic and electric structures as though they were physical objects. The more science learns the truth about existence, the closer they are getting to returning to the Aether theories of the past. How much more strain can mainstream science take before they are forced to recognize the Aether Physics Model?

Another Experiment Supports the APM

Osborn told physicsworld.com that the S± symmetry has “profound consequences for the nature of the pairing interaction”. Unlike the BCS interaction, which is attractive over short distances, Osborn says that S+- symmetry implies that the pairing mechanism in their superconductor is repulsive at short distances and attractive at longer distances. “That’s important information for theorists”, he said, but cautioned “it doesn’t say what the precise mechanism actually is”.

The above quote comes from the linked article at Physicsworld.com titled, "Iron-based superconductors really are different." As in the Casimir effect, the magnetic effects are due to the strong charge orientations of the subatomic particles. The subatomic particle orientation is dictated by the physical structure of the atom. Hence, different atoms at different temperatures (distributed velocity) can have net magnetic north orientation, net magnetic south orientation, or net zero (neutral) magnetic orientation.

If the scientists would like to know what the precise mechanism actually is, they need to read Secrets of the Aether.

Mainstream Discovers APM Prediction of Casimir Effect

Mainstream science is finally catching on. The Aether Physics Model predicts the Casimir force is the strong force law of the electron. The strong force is the force acting on strong charge, which has both magnetic north and south polarity. Naturally, the strong force law (Casimir equation) works for both attractive and repulsive magnetic alignments. To see how the APM unifies all the forces read our Unified Force Theory paper. To understand the basics of the theory, read our Foundation paper.

Antimatter is Gravitationally Repulsive

In an article on NewScientist, there are two proposals to detect whether antimatter is gravitationally repulsive to matter, or not. Fermilab in Chicago and CERN in Switzerland are proposing experiments, which they hope will detect the gravitational relationship of matter and antimatter.

The Aether Physics Model induces that matter and antimatter must be gravitationally repulsive. This can be determined from the observation that two photons can join together to produce a positron-electron pair. Positrons and electrons are massive particles with the same mass, but opposite spins. The two photons must be the source of the angular momentum needed to produce these two particles, which means the right and left spin must already exist in the photon in quantities equal to half the mass of the electron and half the mass of the positron.

Standard Model theory denies the existence of Aether. Yet, the Aether provides the quantifiable structure needed for understanding how electron and positron angular momentum can coexist in the same photon.

The photon and Aether structures are geometrically identical. If the positron and electron angular momentum coexist in an Aether unit, and the photon has zero mass, then in order for two photons to produce a positron-electron pair the positron and electron masses must be opposite and therefore be gravitationally repulsive.

Further evidence of antimatter repulsiveness is observed in positron clouds drifting through space. The only way positron clouds could congregate in the wide spaces is if they were repelled from normal matter at great distances. Although gravity is a weak force, it works at great distances.

This is one experiment I would like Fermilab and CERN to get funding for. Not only could it provide strong evidence in favor of the Aether Physics Model, but it could also reveal a great weakness of General Relativity theory.

Gravitational Waves Detected

The magnetic scalar wave detector is a success! We have captured our first gravitational wave with its associated gamma ray burst. The raw data is available online and is accessible from the Magnetic Scalar Waves page. An Excel spreadsheet lists the exact gravitational wave times along with the GRB time.

In the future, there will likely be gravitational waves listed and no associated gamma ray burst. This is because not all GRBs can be detected due to interference from the Sun, Earth, and Moon. Also, there are occasional satellite equipment malfunctions due to changes in the space environment.

We are presently looking for a theoretical physics partner who is affiliated with a University or professional lab/observatory. If you are interested in collaborating with us, please contact David Thomson through the profile link in the right column.