The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News

The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News:

Here is another moronic story about physics.  This one, however, has a clever "red herring" twist.

Our universe could have popped into existence 13.7 billion years ago without any divine help whatsoever, researchers say.
That may run counter to our instincts, which recoil at the thought of something coming from nothing. But we shouldn't necessarily trust our instincts, for they were honed to help us survive on the African savannah 150,000 years ago, not understand the inner workings of the universe.
Instead, scientists say, we should trust the laws of physics.

The keyword here is "instincts."  They make it sound like anybody who is not a physicist is looking at the world from some kind of primal feeling perspective.  The idea of the Universe suddenly popping into existence 13.7 billion years ago actually runs counter to our intelligence.

The same physicists who believe in the Big Bang theory are also the same physicists who religiously promote the idea that matter can not be either created or destroyed.   These are the same physicists who believe the Universe is accurately explained by both Relativity theories and Quantum Mechanics; theories that make opposite predictions.

With a proper physics paradigm (and not the Standard Model paradigm) we can see that matter is constantly being created and destroyed, which is why the Universe is expanding in some places and contracting in others.  As such, there is about 13.7 billion years worth of matter, or in other words, it takes about 13.7 billion years on average for created matter to migrate to the center of a galaxy and disappear.  This would mean the Universe is eternal; always being both created and destroyed.

On the issue of God, God does show up in the physics.  All the fundamental forces of nature (electric, magnetic, and gravitational) reduce to a common factor, which is the Gforce.  The Gforce appears to be an all pervading, all encompassing, reciprocal force that drives the entire Universe.  It is the Will that perpetually keeps the Universe in its dynamic state.  Call it "God," or not, it does exist and it is part of the science of physics.

New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators

New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators:

"We believe this work could apply to the entire standard model of physics," Jordan says. "It could allow quantum computers to serve as a sort of wind tunnel for testing ideas that often require accelerators today."

Science as we know it is coming to an end.  Instead of observing nature to figure out how the Universe works, NIST is working on a computer program, which will tell nature how it should work according to the Standard Model of Particle Physics.

Forget the fact that there are several contradictory physics theories presently in use, which physicists must choose among in order to get the results they are looking for.  Forget the fact that most of particle physics is strictly a mathematical model of energy flow rather than a physical model of actual particle structure.  Forget the fact that physics is filled with nonsense such as a particle being its own wave, a particle of force, a particle of energy, a particle of mass, and imaginary and unseen particles.  The guys at NIST are so smart they can write equations that tell us precisely how unseen particles are behaving.  And when they look at their results, we can bet they will find exactly what they were looking for.

CERN is already a colossal waste of money that is not showing physicists what they want to see.  They are looking for the particle of mass they call the Higgs Boson, and it isn't there.  The reason for this is quite simple, mass is not matter or energy.  Mass is a dimension, much like length and time.  The problem is not the particle accelerators they are building, the problem is the theories they are working with.  The theories are fundamentally wrong despite their "successes."

The Standard Model theories don't work, therefore their reasoning is that there must be something wrong with nature.  So why waste money on expensive particle accelerators only to have nature not cooperate?  They can bypass nature altogether and write the scripts of reality, themselves.

The Aether Physics Model is the only physics paradigm that models the structures of the quantum realm based directly on the physical measurements of Classical Physics.  If NIST would look at the Aether Physics Model, they would get a proper perspective of reality, and they would be able to model quantum structures and mechanics very accurately.

Atom smasher collides particles at record energies | Fox News

Atom smasher collides particles at record energies | Fox News:

Again, we are hearing the latest wishful thinking about the LHC.  The story marvels about making particles go faster before smashing into each other.  To what effect?  To see even finer particles of  "dust?"

If we throw a wine glass at a brick wall with our hands and then do the same thing with an air cannon, we would naturally predict the glass shards will be smaller with the air cannon.  But how much money and time do we really need to spend on this?

No scientist has ever observed the pieces of a subatomic particle reassembling into a proton or neutron.  In fact, after the collision the collided particles disappear into nothing and are never seen again.  Matter is completely destroyed in these collisions and the scientists witness this fact before their very eyes.

If we wanted to see wine glasses being manufactured, we would not go to a brick-walled bar and hope to see migrant workers gluing the pieces back together.  No, we would go to a plant were silicon dioxide is melted and poured into molds.  If we want to see new subatomic particles being created, we would look at the Casimir effect (for electrons) and nuclear fusion (for protons and neutrons).

In the Casimir effect, new photons are witnessed being created from "the vacuum."  These are no virtual photons, but real photons as CERN finally had to admit.  Photons convert to electrons via the photoelectric effect.  Thus we witness the birth of new electrons.

In nuclear reactors, particularly the fast breeder reactors, physicists witness the creation of more matter than what is actually consumed in the nuclear process.  That is, new protons and neutrons have been added to the atomic nuclei.  This is where we would look for the creation of new protons and neutrons.

We will not find any new physics about the Universe by destroying perfectly good protons and neutrons in high speed accelerators.  We certainly cannot learn about how protons and neutrons are made using this technique.  We can only learn how to destroy them.

The Aether Physics Model provides the correct, mathematical view of quantum existence.  If scientists would study this model, they could make far more progress in physics in far less time and with far less dollars per experiment.

Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments

Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments:

Einstein's theory is not in danger. Einstein predicted that space was curved and that it could be stretched and compacted. The Sagnac effect that space could be dragged, like a fluid. "Frame dragging" is an essential correction in understanding light following a moving planet or star.

Positive holes (p-holes) are quantum units of space carrying charge in an electric circuit. Phonons are longitudinal waves in a stream of photons and demonstrate the space around photons is a compressible as any other fluid. Electric and magnetic fields are regions of space that convey force without the presence of physical matter. The gravitational force is also communicated at a distance through space.

This is possible because space is a 3D fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields, much as Descartes proposed in the 1600s, and as numerous qualified physicists have quantified in the centuries since.

Neutrinos are strings of mass, which exist outside of the Aether fabric, and thus possess no properties of electricity or magnetism. Neutrinos can fly easily through planets and stars because they are not involved in the electric and magnetic fields of the particles comprising those bodies.

It is only when dark matter (strings of mass) are captured by Aether units that they become visible matter and are subjected to the physical laws within the Aether.

The CERN experiment is just one more proof that the Aether exists and that dark matter is not subject to the Aether's physical laws.

Scientists Store Photon Patterns and Retrieve Them From the Same Space Days Later

Scientists Store Photon Patterns and Retrieve Them From the Same Space Days Later:

This story is particularly relevant to the Aether Physics Model. In Secrets of the Aether, I explain that the Aether is a five dimensional space-resonance structure in which space-time is a subset. There is an extra frequency dimension (frequency is reciprocal time) that light sees but which matter cannot see. Photons are able to pass into and out of this hidden time dimension.

As a result, it should be possible to build telescopes that not only see across space, but also to see across time. It would seem we are on our way to discovering such new technology.

Kaluza Klein Theory

Kaluza Klein Theory: "In 1926 Oskar Klein extended this idea. Instead of assuming total independence of the extra dimension, he assumed it to be compact. This means the fifth dimension would have the topoloy of a circle, with a radius of the order of the Planck length. Five dimensional space-time then has the topology , and the fifth coordinate y is periodic, , where is the inverse radius of the circle. In our normal perception of space-time we would never be able to see this extra dimension."

'via Blog this'

I'm learning something new every day. The five dimensional physics theory I found in Classical Mechanics was apparently proposed in 1919 by Theodor Kaluza. However, he saw the missing dimension as a curled length dimension. I show the five dimensions are the three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency.

What we perceive as time pertains only when observing matter. All matter composes of half-spin subatomic particles, which are unable to spin in the backward direction of quantum frequency. However, light is capable of existing in both forward and backward time, and thus exists within a five dimensional framework.

This means radio and light waves can be manipulated to reveal information in not only the present, but also the past and possibly a short duration into the future.

Has The 'God Particle' Been Found? Major Announcement Expected Tuesday | Fox News

Has The 'God Particle' Been Found? Major Announcement Expected Tuesday | Fox News: "This particle, which has long been theorized but never detected, is thought to give all other particles mass. "

'via Blog this'

This "discovery" is the most absurd of all absurdities in the Standard Model. Mass is a dimension, not a material thing. To say that a particle gives other particles mass is as absurd as claiming to discover a length particle that gives matter length. It's just as absurd as the so-called "force particle" "bosons." Force is not caused by particles, either.

If they are going to say that mass is a particle, then time, length, and charge would also have to be particles. But they are not, they are dimensions. That is, they are properties of things, not things themselves.