One of my papers, Calculations of the Unified Force Theory, has been entered into a contest at FQXi.org. The winning essay will be published in Scientific American. For those who are interested, the paper can be viewed at:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1531
There is also an opportunity for readers to vote on the paper and post comments.
Monday, September 10, 2012
Wednesday, July 04, 2012
The Higgs Boson (Field) is a Massive Fraud
Understanding the Higgs boson | Cutting Edge - CNET News:
This is absurdity to the extreme. They are saying the Higgs is both a boson (particle) and field (space). Now in addition to wave/particle duality we have space/particle duality. An object can be both a thing and the space it occupies at the same time. They have now defined space as matter, or at least as the source of matter. Actually, what they have done is sunk deeper into the cloud of ignorance in order to justify spending billions of dollars on a failed experiment.
Let me also put it to you another way. They are saying that some cosmic process is using cosmic construction paper for cutting out a particle that wastes more than 99% of the paper. That is what a proton is to the Standard Model. What happens to the rest of the Higgs field and why does it not affect macro matter if it can affect quantum matter? When 1% of the Higgs is used to make a proton, what happens to the other 99%?
If that 99% produces another proton, then the Higgs obviously no longer has the mass discovered by CERN! If that 99% does not produce a proton, it means there is a lot of unused Higgs field that can affect other protons. The logic clearly does not work.
They have not only "discovered" a new particle, they have "discovered" a whole new reality that is nothing like the reality the rest of the world experiences.
What's more, this Higgs field is said to be the source of mass. Mass is a dimension, like length and time. It is not a physical object. Just look at any unit. The unit of energy is equal to mass times length squared divided by time squared. Mass is not a field any more than length is a field; or time is a field.
When you see how big the CERN facility is and how many people work there, you can see that the outcome was predetermined. A study should be commissioned The Hto examine how many people had to be demoted and fired in order for the data to produce positive results.
Monday, June 25, 2012
The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News
The Big Bang didn't need God to start universe, researchers say | Fox News:
Here is another moronic story about physics. This one, however, has a clever "red herring" twist.
The same physicists who believe in the Big Bang theory are also the same physicists who religiously promote the idea that matter can not be either created or destroyed. These are the same physicists who believe the Universe is accurately explained by both Relativity theories and Quantum Mechanics; theories that make opposite predictions.
With a proper physics paradigm (and not the Standard Model paradigm) we can see that matter is constantly being created and destroyed, which is why the Universe is expanding in some places and contracting in others. As such, there is about 13.7 billion years worth of matter, or in other words, it takes about 13.7 billion years on average for created matter to migrate to the center of a galaxy and disappear. This would mean the Universe is eternal; always being both created and destroyed.
On the issue of God, God does show up in the physics. All the fundamental forces of nature (electric, magnetic, and gravitational) reduce to a common factor, which is the Gforce. The Gforce appears to be an all pervading, all encompassing, reciprocal force that drives the entire Universe. It is the Will that perpetually keeps the Universe in its dynamic state. Call it "God," or not, it does exist and it is part of the science of physics.
Here is another moronic story about physics. This one, however, has a clever "red herring" twist.
Our universe could have popped into existence 13.7 billion years ago without any divine help whatsoever, researchers say.The keyword here is "instincts." They make it sound like anybody who is not a physicist is looking at the world from some kind of primal feeling perspective. The idea of the Universe suddenly popping into existence 13.7 billion years ago actually runs counter to our intelligence.
That may run counter to our instincts, which recoil at the thought of something coming from nothing. But we shouldn't necessarily trust our instincts, for they were honed to help us survive on the African savannah 150,000 years ago, not understand the inner workings of the universe.
Instead, scientists say, we should trust the laws of physics.
The same physicists who believe in the Big Bang theory are also the same physicists who religiously promote the idea that matter can not be either created or destroyed. These are the same physicists who believe the Universe is accurately explained by both Relativity theories and Quantum Mechanics; theories that make opposite predictions.
With a proper physics paradigm (and not the Standard Model paradigm) we can see that matter is constantly being created and destroyed, which is why the Universe is expanding in some places and contracting in others. As such, there is about 13.7 billion years worth of matter, or in other words, it takes about 13.7 billion years on average for created matter to migrate to the center of a galaxy and disappear. This would mean the Universe is eternal; always being both created and destroyed.
On the issue of God, God does show up in the physics. All the fundamental forces of nature (electric, magnetic, and gravitational) reduce to a common factor, which is the Gforce. The Gforce appears to be an all pervading, all encompassing, reciprocal force that drives the entire Universe. It is the Will that perpetually keeps the Universe in its dynamic state. Call it "God," or not, it does exist and it is part of the science of physics.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators
New Quantum Computing Algorithm Could Simulate Giant Particle Accelerators:
Forget the fact that there are several contradictory physics theories presently in use, which physicists must choose among in order to get the results they are looking for. Forget the fact that most of particle physics is strictly a mathematical model of energy flow rather than a physical model of actual particle structure. Forget the fact that physics is filled with nonsense such as a particle being its own wave, a particle of force, a particle of energy, a particle of mass, and imaginary and unseen particles. The guys at NIST are so smart they can write equations that tell us precisely how unseen particles are behaving. And when they look at their results, we can bet they will find exactly what they were looking for.
CERN is already a colossal waste of money that is not showing physicists what they want to see. They are looking for the particle of mass they call the Higgs Boson, and it isn't there. The reason for this is quite simple, mass is not matter or energy. Mass is a dimension, much like length and time. The problem is not the particle accelerators they are building, the problem is the theories they are working with. The theories are fundamentally wrong despite their "successes."
The Standard Model theories don't work, therefore their reasoning is that there must be something wrong with nature. So why waste money on expensive particle accelerators only to have nature not cooperate? They can bypass nature altogether and write the scripts of reality, themselves.
The Aether Physics Model is the only physics paradigm that models the structures of the quantum realm based directly on the physical measurements of Classical Physics. If NIST would look at the Aether Physics Model, they would get a proper perspective of reality, and they would be able to model quantum structures and mechanics very accurately.
"We believe this work could apply to the entire standard model of physics," Jordan says. "It could allow quantum computers to serve as a sort of wind tunnel for testing ideas that often require accelerators today."Science as we know it is coming to an end. Instead of observing nature to figure out how the Universe works, NIST is working on a computer program, which will tell nature how it should work according to the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
Forget the fact that there are several contradictory physics theories presently in use, which physicists must choose among in order to get the results they are looking for. Forget the fact that most of particle physics is strictly a mathematical model of energy flow rather than a physical model of actual particle structure. Forget the fact that physics is filled with nonsense such as a particle being its own wave, a particle of force, a particle of energy, a particle of mass, and imaginary and unseen particles. The guys at NIST are so smart they can write equations that tell us precisely how unseen particles are behaving. And when they look at their results, we can bet they will find exactly what they were looking for.
CERN is already a colossal waste of money that is not showing physicists what they want to see. They are looking for the particle of mass they call the Higgs Boson, and it isn't there. The reason for this is quite simple, mass is not matter or energy. Mass is a dimension, much like length and time. The problem is not the particle accelerators they are building, the problem is the theories they are working with. The theories are fundamentally wrong despite their "successes."
The Standard Model theories don't work, therefore their reasoning is that there must be something wrong with nature. So why waste money on expensive particle accelerators only to have nature not cooperate? They can bypass nature altogether and write the scripts of reality, themselves.
The Aether Physics Model is the only physics paradigm that models the structures of the quantum realm based directly on the physical measurements of Classical Physics. If NIST would look at the Aether Physics Model, they would get a proper perspective of reality, and they would be able to model quantum structures and mechanics very accurately.
Friday, April 06, 2012
Atom smasher collides particles at record energies | Fox News
Atom smasher collides particles at record energies | Fox News:
Again, we are hearing the latest wishful thinking about the LHC. The story marvels about making particles go faster before smashing into each other. To what effect? To see even finer particles of "dust?"
If we throw a wine glass at a brick wall with our hands and then do the same thing with an air cannon, we would naturally predict the glass shards will be smaller with the air cannon. But how much money and time do we really need to spend on this?
No scientist has ever observed the pieces of a subatomic particle reassembling into a proton or neutron. In fact, after the collision the collided particles disappear into nothing and are never seen again. Matter is completely destroyed in these collisions and the scientists witness this fact before their very eyes.
If we wanted to see wine glasses being manufactured, we would not go to a brick-walled bar and hope to see migrant workers gluing the pieces back together. No, we would go to a plant were silicon dioxide is melted and poured into molds. If we want to see new subatomic particles being created, we would look at the Casimir effect (for electrons) and nuclear fusion (for protons and neutrons).
In the Casimir effect, new photons are witnessed being created from "the vacuum." These are no virtual photons, but real photons as CERN finally had to admit. Photons convert to electrons via the photoelectric effect. Thus we witness the birth of new electrons.
In nuclear reactors, particularly the fast breeder reactors, physicists witness the creation of more matter than what is actually consumed in the nuclear process. That is, new protons and neutrons have been added to the atomic nuclei. This is where we would look for the creation of new protons and neutrons.
We will not find any new physics about the Universe by destroying perfectly good protons and neutrons in high speed accelerators. We certainly cannot learn about how protons and neutrons are made using this technique. We can only learn how to destroy them.
The Aether Physics Model provides the correct, mathematical view of quantum existence. If scientists would study this model, they could make far more progress in physics in far less time and with far less dollars per experiment.
Again, we are hearing the latest wishful thinking about the LHC. The story marvels about making particles go faster before smashing into each other. To what effect? To see even finer particles of "dust?"
If we throw a wine glass at a brick wall with our hands and then do the same thing with an air cannon, we would naturally predict the glass shards will be smaller with the air cannon. But how much money and time do we really need to spend on this?
No scientist has ever observed the pieces of a subatomic particle reassembling into a proton or neutron. In fact, after the collision the collided particles disappear into nothing and are never seen again. Matter is completely destroyed in these collisions and the scientists witness this fact before their very eyes.
If we wanted to see wine glasses being manufactured, we would not go to a brick-walled bar and hope to see migrant workers gluing the pieces back together. No, we would go to a plant were silicon dioxide is melted and poured into molds. If we want to see new subatomic particles being created, we would look at the Casimir effect (for electrons) and nuclear fusion (for protons and neutrons).
In the Casimir effect, new photons are witnessed being created from "the vacuum." These are no virtual photons, but real photons as CERN finally had to admit. Photons convert to electrons via the photoelectric effect. Thus we witness the birth of new electrons.
In nuclear reactors, particularly the fast breeder reactors, physicists witness the creation of more matter than what is actually consumed in the nuclear process. That is, new protons and neutrons have been added to the atomic nuclei. This is where we would look for the creation of new protons and neutrons.
We will not find any new physics about the Universe by destroying perfectly good protons and neutrons in high speed accelerators. We certainly cannot learn about how protons and neutrons are made using this technique. We can only learn how to destroy them.
The Aether Physics Model provides the correct, mathematical view of quantum existence. If scientists would study this model, they could make far more progress in physics in far less time and with far less dollars per experiment.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments
Is Einstein’s Theory in Danger? - Developer Zone - National Instruments:
Einstein's theory is not in danger. Einstein predicted that space was curved and that it could be stretched and compacted. The Sagnac effect that space could be dragged, like a fluid. "Frame dragging" is an essential correction in understanding light following a moving planet or star.
Positive holes (p-holes) are quantum units of space carrying charge in an electric circuit. Phonons are longitudinal waves in a stream of photons and demonstrate the space around photons is a compressible as any other fluid. Electric and magnetic fields are regions of space that convey force without the presence of physical matter. The gravitational force is also communicated at a distance through space.
This is possible because space is a 3D fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields, much as Descartes proposed in the 1600s, and as numerous qualified physicists have quantified in the centuries since.
Neutrinos are strings of mass, which exist outside of the Aether fabric, and thus possess no properties of electricity or magnetism. Neutrinos can fly easily through planets and stars because they are not involved in the electric and magnetic fields of the particles comprising those bodies.
It is only when dark matter (strings of mass) are captured by Aether units that they become visible matter and are subjected to the physical laws within the Aether.
The CERN experiment is just one more proof that the Aether exists and that dark matter is not subject to the Aether's physical laws.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)