Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says

Nuclear Fusion Power Could Be Here By 2030, One Company Says:



This is my response, which I posted to the article:

Man, do they have it wrong! First, the Sun isn't just hydrogen and helium. Every star, and every hot planet, has a neutron core. Neutron core's are extremely radioactive. Astrophysicists know that after a supernova, when the main body of a star is blasted into space, a neutron core is all that survives. Our star is no different. Read the life work of Oliver Manuel to understand how stars are truly composed and how they actually operate.

Second, it takes a lot of energy to create and sustain these plasmas. The theory is that once the plasma get's started, it will be self-sustaining. Yet, the so-called fusion bombs were not self-sustaining. If they were, our planet would have turned into a mini star by now due to all the hydrogen bombs that were detonated.

Third, they have the physics wrong. Fusion is not a process where free floating atoms are stuck together through magnetic pinching. The Universe is not a giant Lego kit where scientists can put pieces together and make their own frankenstein. The Universe is a constantly creating machine of living processes, and not all life is cellular; life processes occur even at the subatomic level. The physics for creating matter has been touched on in the discovery and experiments relating to the Casimir effect, but the scientific community dismisses that the created matter is real. They call the created matter "virtual" because it doesn't fit with their limited postulates about how the Universe works. They can't fathom that the boundary of the Universe extends beyond physical matter and into non-material existence.

Fusion is a process similar to the Casimir effect, but it occurs between protons instead of electrons, and it occurs inside of atoms. There is no such thing as either fission or fusion, at least not as the concepts are envisioned by today's academics. Instead, there is a change of distance between protons inside the atom, which activates protons to vibrate the space between them and to generate a proton-sized photon. If there is an empty shell position inside the atom, the photon will be converted into a proton via an effect similar to the photoelectric effect (where a photon acts on a valence position in the outer shells of the atom to produce an electron). This added proton in the nucleus can either cause the atom to split, or it can generate another proton-sized photon inside the atom, but where much of the angular momentum escapes the nucleus and some of it produces an electron; the proton and electron then combine to produce a neutron.

In any case, the ideal situation for generating atomic reactions is inside heavy elements, and not in trying to stick two protons together in open space. And no matter how you make atomic reactions, you are always creating new matter and new energy. This is the mechanism that keeps the Universe expanding. It is also the mechanism that makes stars and planets grow in size over time. It is the mechanism whereby the Sun can release energy even as it grows over time. It is the mechanism that causes a nuclear reactor to produce more fuel than it consumes (bet you didn't know that, because this information is kept secret). At the root of it all, all matter is bred by converting dark matter into visible matter.

Scientists know that the mass of most galaxies is mostly due to dark matter, and they know that the Universe is expanding, and they know that nuclear reactors produce more fuel (more mass) than they consume, and they know the Earth and Stars are growing from within, and they know the Casimir effect generates lots of new photons and electrons, and yet they still can't put the pieces of the physics puzzle together right. Seventy years of fusion research failure is not enough to make them look at alternative theories. And yet, I have figured out the simple dimensinal analysis and Newtonian force equations that show how this all works.

The old-timer scientists are a lost cause, but I hope that younger and more open minds will someday look more closely at my work, and help me fix all the mistakes made during the past 100 years by paternalistic, masters of the Universe egos. You can read my work at sota.aetherwizard.com.

(12) David Thomson's answer to If there are 4 forces in nature, why not just one? Can anyone unify gravity, electric -magnetic force, the strong/weak nuclear force of nature. - Quora

(12) David Thomson's answer to If there are 4 forces in nature, why not just one? Can anyone unify gravity, electric -magnetic force, the strong/weak nuclear force of nature. - Quora:



'via Blog this'