The Aether by a Different Name

Below is a recent article by the American Institute of Physics.

"The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in effect a quantum
dot."

This is how science talks about the observable Aether without admitting it exists. They simply change the name. Other examples of observable and manipulable Aether are "magnetic field," "electric field," "gravitational field," "spin," "phonon," and "frame dragging." There are even more examples.

How is it that science claims the Aether cannot exist, and yet they describe the properties of "tiny regions" that can remain static and also move?

Also, notice how they can create longitudinal waves with these "tiny regions." Acoustic waves are longitudinal waves. Longitudinal waves can only occur in a medium of some sort. That medium is the Aether.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: physnews@aip.org [mailto:physnews@aip.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 10:03 AM
> Subject: Physics News Update 838
>
>
> PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
> The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
> Number 838 September 7, 2007 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
> www.aip.org/pnu
>
> ACOUSTIC QUANTUM DOTS. A new experiment at the Cavendish Lab
> at the University of Cambridge is the first to controllably
> shuttle electrons around a chip and observe their quantum
> properties. A quantum dot restricts electrons to a region of
> space in a semiconductor so tiny as to be essentially
> zero-dimensional. This in turn enforces a quantum regime;
> the electron may only have certain discrete energies, which
> can be useful, depending on the circumstances, for producing
> laser light or for use in detectors and maybe even future computers.
> A quantum dot is usually made not by carving the
> semiconductor into a tiny grain but rather by imposing
> restrictions on the electron*s possible motions by the
> application of voltages to nearby electrodes. This would be
> a static quantum dot. It is also possible to make dynamic
> quantum dots-that is, moving dots that are created by the
> passage of surface acoustic waves (SAWs) moving through a
> narrow channel across the plane of a specially designed
> circuit chip (see figure at http://www.aip.org/png/2007/289.htm).
> The acoustic wave itself is generated by applying microwaves
> to interleaved fingered electrodes atop a piezoelectric
> material like GaAs. The applied electric fields between
> finger-electrodes induce a sound wave to propagate along the
> surface of the material.
> These acoustic waves have the ability to scoop electrons and
> chauffeur them along the surface.
> The tiny region confining the electron even as it moves is in
> effect a quantum dot. Such acoustic-based dynamic quantum
> dots have made before, but according to Cambridge researcher
> Michael Astley (mra28@cam.ac.uk), this is the first time the
> tunneling of the electrons (even single electrons) into and
> out of the quantum dots has been observed. This is an
> important part of the whole electron-shuttling process since
> one wants control over the electron motions and spins. If,
> moreover, electrons in two very close acoustic wave channels
> could be entangled, then this would present the chance to
> make a sort of flying qubit, which could be at the heart of a
> quantum computer. (Astley et al., Physical Review Letters,
> upcoming article; lab website at
> http://www.sp.phy.cam.ac.uk/SPWeb/research/SAWQC/research.html#SAWQC)
>

SSE 2007 and Kronia Conference Follow Up

I successfully presented the Electron Binding Energy equation to the SSE 2007 conference with Colleen Thomas.

I received several positive comments and will be submitting a paper to the JSE journal. Since arriving back home, I have made significant progress on fine tuning the EBE equation. It is now accurate to within .05% of the empirical ground state binding energies.

After att

SSE 2007 Conference

I have been accepted to present the Electron Binding Energy equation at the Society for Scientific Exploration 2007 annual conference at the end of May. I will explain the structure of the EBE equation and show the latest success at predicting all the ground state electron binding energies. Not only does the equation predict all the ground state binding energies with reasonable accuracy, but it also appears to have uncovered a slight correction for the nitrogen ground state binding energy, in particular.

According to Gwyn Williams, a noted expert on electron binding energies, there are at least two experiments, which provide different binding energies than the presently accepted one. The present nitrogen grounds state is listed at 409.9eV, yet two other studies give 401.9eV and 403eV. According to my equation, the nitrogen ground state binding energy should be 403.9eV.

The SSE 2007 conference is open to the public for all who wish to attend.

After the SSE conference, I have been invited to another private conference to meet with top scientists developing the Electric Universe model. Whereas the Electric Universe model is the electric version of cosmology, the Aether Physics Model is the electric version of quantum physics. As many of you familiar with the APM know, General Relativity theory specifically has an electric counterpart in the Aether Physics Model.

Although my key registration and transportation expenses have already been paid by a generous supporter of Quantum AetherDynamics Institute, I still must raise funds for travel expenses for ten days. Anybody wishing to make a tax deductible donation to QADI may do so at NetworkForGood.org, or the PayPal button on the home page.

This marks another milestone in the development of the Aether Physics Model.

Does the Higgs Boson Exist?

In the February 2001 edition of the AIP's Physics News Update, it was stated:

Fermilab's Tevatron machine will resume its operations in March 2001 and will run for five years, and it too will search for the Higgs. Fermilab can, in principle, search for Higgs's as massive as 180 GeV, but CERN's efforts will have helped Fermilab, at least at first, in sifting the incoming returns for signs of the Higgs. With its new higher luminosity (essentially the intensity of the beams), the Tevatron should be able to produce about 10¹⁵ proton-antiproton collisions.

It has now been over 5 years and this is this week's summary of the Higgs boson search:

"Physicists from Fermilab’s Tevatron collider have just reported their most comprehensive summary yet of physics at the highest laboratory energies. At last week’s American Physical Society (APS) meeting in Jacksonville, Florida they delivered dozens of papers on a spectrum of topics, many of which are related in some way to the Higgs boson."

In short, they still have not found it.

"The Higgs is the cornerstone ingredient in the standard model of high energy physics. It is the particle manifestation of the curious mechanism that kicked in at an early moment in the life of the universe: the W and Z bosons (the carriers of the weak force) became endowed with mass while the photon (the carrier of the electromagnetic force) did not. This asymmetry makes the two forces very different in the way they operate in the universe."

Notice how the Higgs is believed to become endowed with mass, but no physical process is identified, neither is there any definition of what "mass" is. Then they say that the photon does not have mass and claim it is the carrier of the electromagnetic force.

First off, the mass and charge are defined specifically as dimensions in the Aether Physics Model. Mass and charge are no more particulate than length or time. But just as there is a finite distance between your eyes and your computer monitor, which can be accurately measured, there is no such particulate thing as "length" which is there to measure. Length is a form of non-material reality, which is measurable and thus real. Mass, charge, and time are similarly different forms of non-material reality.

The Higgs boson is a theoretical construct needed by the Standard Model to complete the theory. Unfortunately, the Standard Model is based upon the wrong understanding of what mass and charge are, so the predicted particles are nothing more than fantasies. Even the W and Z bosons have never been observed. All that has been observed are specific calculated energies, which have been explained in a dimensionless mathematical model and interpreted as "particles." In the Aether Physics Model, the weak force is the proportion of the electrostatic charge to the strong charge. However, the Standard Model does not recognize the strong charge, even though it easily expresses mathematically as the angular momentum of the subatomic particle times the conductance of the Aether.

There is no Higgs boson. All that exists is billions of dollars of wasted taxpayer money, thousands of theoretical papers, and a bunch of physicists praying they will find it soon so they can justify more than 20 years of expensive and time consuming research.

The Aether Physics Model provides the correct understanding of sub-quantum structure, which is a non-material form of reality. Mass is nothing more than a dimension, albeit a very real dimension. In order to understand mass, one has to break away from the concept that physical reality is an ever decreasing size of physical particle. It is as though modern physicists intend to understand the Universe by creating a sharper knife.

The reality is that physical existence arose from non-material existence, as the physics of the Aether Physics Model clearly reveals.

Still Room for New Knowledge

A recent article on Space.com highlights (once again) the incomplete nature of modern physics theories and astrophysics theories. As I show on one of my web pages, other stellar examples do not agree with modern theory, either. In the article about "light echos," I show with NASA's own photos that the light echo theory is flawed. Apparently, the scale of distance used by NASA is far from accurate.

In the article about the Luminous Blue Variable star explosion in galaxy UGC 4904, we at least get a direct admission that modern theory doesn't work, rather than some lame concept like "light echoes."

A recently-observed supernova is making some astrophysicists doubt prevailing theories for how stars die.

The massive star, located in galaxy UGC 4904 about 77 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Lynx, threw off a huge amount of material on October 20, 2004. This star, which may have been what's known as a Luminous Blue Variable (LBV), was mistaken for a supernova, as LBV's often are. In fact, some observers refer to them as "supernova imposters."

Then, in the fall of 2006, the star exploded into a full supernova, much sooner than expected. Dubbed Supernova 2006jc, the dying star's blast wave apparently reached the shell of drifting material released in the earlier outburst in mere hours.

The wave heated the ejected gases to millions of degrees, sparking X-ray emissions of an intensity and duration never before detected. NASA’s Swift satellite recorded X-rays brightening from the supernova for an unprecedented 100 days. All previously observed supernovae have initially appeared bright in X-rays before quickly turning invisible.

"We have never observed a stellar outburst and then later seen the star explode," said University of California at Berkeley astronomer Ryan Foley.

First of all, is a "blast wave" a technical term? What is the blast wave made out of that it can heat ejected gases to millions of degrees and spark super intense X-ray emissions? If the X-ray emissions are secondary, and the "blast wave" struck matter to produce X-rays, then the "blast wave" cannot be made out of photons or matter. In order for the so-called "blast wave" to move so fast it had to be a gravity wave (a ripple in the fabric of space-time, or Aether).

Not only did this "blast wave" excite X-rays in its own debris field, but when the "blast wave" arrived at our Sun it also produced x-rays on it, too. The so-called blast waves are gravity waves, and they often travel faster than the speed of light. So in this case, our Sun released intense bursts of X-ray flares more than a day before the associated gamma ray burst from the LBV reached our Sun as seen in the solar X-ray flare graph below (click on image to see full size):



Scientists at Caltech and MIT have spent lots of NSF money building a gravity wave detector in space, but have not yet reported a single gravity wave. However, by simply watching the solar X-ray data, I have witnessed hundreds of separate gravity wave incidents passing through our solar system.

It is clear what the problem is. If gravity waves are ripples in space-time, and they arrive before gamma rays do, then the fabric of space-time must be very real and independent from photons. Or in other words, there really must be an Aether in which photons travel and which can be mechanically modulated separate from electromagnetic radiation.

Light exerts force on matter

In our paper, A New Foundation for Physics, we provide a simple equation showing that photons exert force over an area. The equation is written:

phtn = forc * area

Light is further quantified as photon times frequency:

ligt = phtn * freq

We give the example of the Crooke's radiometer for the above equations. As photons strike the surface of the radiometer vanes they impart angular momentum, which manifests as force over an area. Since the black vanes absorb light (photons) and the silver vanes reflect light, the angular momentum is transfered to the dark vanes more than the silver vanes, thus resulting in the spinning.

Scientists at the University of Chicago have now used laser light to exert a force on soapy water, which creates a jet stream within the water. In the case of the soapy water, the surfactant in the soap apparently breaks down the binding force between water molecules, thus allowing them to move relative to each other with much less resistance. The naturally absorptive water then absorbs photons, which exerts force upon an area the width of the laser beam. The force pushes the freely moving water molecules into motion relative to surrounding water molecules.

The same effect occurs with sunlight shining on asteroids. A recent news release on EurekAlert describes an observation of the YORP effect on a near Earth asteroid.

YORP is a torque due to sunlight shining on the surfaces of asteroids and meteoroids and warming their surfaces, leading to a gentle recoil effect as the heat is emitted.

The "official" explanation of "a gentle recoil effect as heat is emitted" is nonsense as heat does not inherently have mass, nor is heat capable of causing motion. Heat is the measure of temperature associated with distributed motion within a medium, heat is not the motion's cause. The cause of a change in motion is the force associated with collision of bodies with mass.

In the Standard Model, the photon is considered to be massless. In the Aether Physics Model, the photon is said to have "net zero mass." There is a big difference between the two concepts. In the Standard Model there is no mass at all. In the Aether Physics Model a photon possesses half angular momentum due to electrons and half angular momentum due to positrons. The equal portions of electron and positron angular momentum cancel each other out, yet both angular momenta remain within the photon.

Thus, when a photon is absorbed into an appropriate atom it can produce electrons, positrons, or both, depending upon the atomic structure. In any case, when the photon is absorbed into an atom it exerts a force upon an area, as several physical observations in nature clearly demonstrate.