Electron angular momentum causes spirals in free space

NIST has again helped the Aether Physics Model.


"Passing electrons through a nanometer-scale grating, the scientists imparted the resulting electron waves with so much orbital momentum that they maintained a corkscrew shape in free space."


The Aether Physics Model explains the structure of subatomic particles as having toroidal geometry.  This toroidal geometry is dynamically scanned, rather than being a static donut.  The scanning of the toroidal shape is what gives the electron its intrinsic angular momentum.


The only way the electron can maintain a corkscrew shape in "free space" (aka Aether) is if the structures of the electron and the space allow it.  If the electron was a point particle, there would be no basis for this corkscrew behavior, as there is nothing the electron could orbit that could impart the property of angular momentum.  The electron's behavior can only be explained if the angular momentum is inherent to the electron, as described in the Aether Physics Model.


"A beam of corkscrew-shaped electrons, when interacting with a specimen, can exert torque on the material, by exchanging angular momentum with its atoms.  In this way, the corkscrew electrons could obtain more information in the process than beams with ordinary electrons, which do not carry this orbital angular momentum."


This truly is a novel technique for extending the usefulness of the electron, but it is not physically explainable with the Standard Model of Physics.

Intergalactic Weather Map - An Ice Cube Makes the Room Warmer?

The nonsense is never ending at NASA. Check out this article: NASA - Intergalactic Weather Map

To begin with, they are producing a temperature map of the space surrounding galaxy NGC 5813 and reverse the temperature scale. Instead of using red to represent the cooler temperature and blue to represent the higher temperature, such as in reality, blue is cooler and red is warmer.

In the produced map, the galaxy is seen as cooler than the surrounding space. NASA's interpretation? The cool galaxy is heating up the surrounding space at huge scales of distance. An ice cube makes the room warmer? How does NASA explain this?

Powerful jets produced as gas swirls toward the black hole push cavities into the hot gas and drive shock waves -- like sonic booms -- outwards, heating the gas.

So gas (nearly invisible hydrogen with practically no mass) swirls into a mythical black hole and then produces powerful shock waves that heat up vast areas of space light years from the source without heating the galaxy. A rational person would ask why the more dense gas near the galaxy does not heat up more than the far distant regions of space! It is as though their proposed shock waves possess magical properties transcending space.

If one were to look at this scenario from the perspective of the Aether Physics Model, one would see the so-called "black hole" as a region of disappearing matter at the center of a galaxy. The larger a galaxy is, the faster matter disappears at its center. Thus the light and matter traveling to the center of the galaxy disappears and the center of the galaxy appears cooler than the surrounding space. A similar effect happens in tornadoes, and wind vortexes on Earth, although in these cases the heat is pumped away in the form of infrared radiation, such as at the tops of strong thunderstorms.

Matter continually is created through the Casimir effect (affecting electrons), and fusion (affecting protons). Thus in regions away from galactic centers, it would appear warmer.

The collapsing of matter at the centers of galaxies and the generation of matter in the outer regions creates the inward spiral that is seen in all well established galaxies.

The jets observed in the polar regions of the galaxies are similar to the jets of heat seen above thunderstorms. The inward spiral both destroys matter, but also squeezes matter and causes some of it to escape at high velocities.

Radiation ripples show the Big Bang theory is wrong.

Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths, Wired reports.

What the evidence really suggests is that the Universe is eternal, as the Aether Physics Model suggests.

The Big Bang theory absurdly claims all matter matter in the Universe exploded out of a point smaller than an atom. The estimate for the beginning time of this explosion has varied from 13 billion years ago to 20 billion years ago, depending upon where in the Universe one looks.

The large bands of dark matter, if they exist, are more likely to be caused by random magnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational structures that occur at huge scales, which would mirror that randomly spread clusters of galaxies throughout the visible Universe.

Another failure of the Big Bang theory is that there is no apparent edge to the Universe. The stronger telescopes are made, the further they can see, with no end in sight.

The article tries to spin the lack of Big Bang evidence into a new theory where concentric circles are born from the same location in the Universe, which would mean there would be something magical about that location. And then concludes with this sentence, "However he added that there was not enough detail to assess the reality of the circles yet." In other words, there is no more evidence for the concentric circles than there is for the Big Bang.

The Aether Physics Model shows that the Universe is continually expanding and contracting at the same time. The outer rings of galaxies expand with new matter, and the centers of galaxies implode old matter, which causes the galactic spirals to occur. Dark matter is nothing more than visible matter losing its charge when the space-time around it collapses. Visible matter is dark matter that gains charge when new Aether is generated during the Casimir effect and fusion.

"Empty Eruption"?

According to the Standard Model, magnetism is a property of matter, it is not a substance of itself.  Yet, when science observation shows that magnetism is indeed a substance of itself, scientists have no problem saying so.  The following is from spaceweather.com...

This was an "empty eruption." It hurled no significant cloud of plasma into space. Imagine something exploding with more power than ten atomic bombs and not producing a spray of debris. That's essentially what happened here. The loop was made of more magnetism than matter.

Magnetism is empty space, hence it produces an empty eruption when it explodes.  So it is very clear that magnetism is real and has real properties, which releases real energy.  But what is this empty space that it could release so much energy?

The empty space is Aether, the non-material substance that carries light across the Universe and which physicists claim does not exist.  And despite the constant denials, physicists continually observe empty space doing work such as with phonons, magnetic fields, electrostatic fields, gravitational fields, spins, and other observable non-material forms of reality.

How much longer will it be before Aether is welcomed back into mainstream science?

Vajra Periodic Table

Today, I have released the new Vajra Periodic Table for the Aether Physics Model. The purpose of this periodic table is to provide a visual reference to researchers trying to discover the nuclear binding energy equation.

Fernando Dufour came up with the general concept in his 3D Periodic Table, however, his model places all the elements to the same side of the hydrogen atom. It seemed to me that this is not the natural state of atomic construction. Atomic construction should be symmetrical, and so I began drawing images of a symmetrical periodic table until this form manifested.

What struck me about the finished layout is that the overall design resembled the ancient Vajra concept. It almost seems as though the ancients already knew how atoms constructed within the Aether. So I named the periodic table after the ancient Vajra model.

You can purchase a wall print of this Periodic Table in just about any size at Zazzle.  The poster was designed to be 42.5" by 32.5" and is in high resolution in the print format.

Scientific Discovery Too Hard - Turning in the Towel

It looks like new discoveries in mainstream physics is nearing the end.

Russell Stannard, professor emeritus of physics at the Open University, argues that although existing scientific knowledge will continue to be applied in news ways, "the gaining of knowledge about fundamental laws of nature and the constituents of the world, that must come to an end”.

Too bad. If they would study the Aether Physics Model and see that their charge notation is wrong, and that there are two quantifiable fundamental charges (electrostatic charge and magnetic charge), they would be making new fundamental discoveries. Furthermore, science would suddenly become easy to understand, and agree with common sense.

Instead of spending billions of dollars and wasting thousands of top-rate scientists time by working on particle accelerators designed to find non-existent particles, they could be reworking the foundations of physics to fix its errors.

But try to show these same physicists their errors and their feelings get hurt. They become incredibly defensive and extremely rude. Instead of admitting error, they build bigger machines, spend more money, and waste more time. They are like little children who have not been taught humility.

Eventually, the one-track-minded scientists will die off and younger, more flexible minds will fill their prestigious seats. Won't they be shocked when they see the proper foundations for physics were long ignored, even though they were made plainly visible on the Internet?

APM solves Casimir's Problem

In 1948, Hendrick Casimir and D. Polder wrote a paper concerning their quantification of what has become known as the Casimir force.

Casimir derived his equation to a fourth order perturbation. This amounted to a reasonable approximation for the force, but it was not precise.

In the Aether Physics Model I developed the magnetic force law for the electron. Later, I discovered the magnetic force law for the electron was nearly identical to the Casimir force equation, although transposed into different units and constants.

Just today, it was brought to my attention that Hendrick Casimir's paper published in Phys Rev 73, 360 is now available online. Here is the last paragraph of that paper:

"The very simple form of eq (56) and the analogous formula (25) suggest that it might be possible to derive these expressions, perhaps apart from the numerical factors, by more elementary considerations. This would be desirable since it would also give a more physical background to our result, a result which in our opinion is rather remarkable. So far we have not been able to find such a simple argument."

Casimir had been looking for the simple expression for his equation, but was unable to find it. The reason was because modern physics incorrectly notates the dimension of charge (it should always be distributed) and also modern physics did not discover the proper quantification for magnetic charge (strong charge, electromagnetic charge). The APM fixed these errors of modern physics and solved the Casimir Problem.